Author:
Martinez Maria Alejandra Frias,Balderrama Ísis de Fátima,Karam Paula Stephania Brandão Hage,de Oliveira Rodrigo Cardoso,de Oliveira Flávia Amadeu,Grandini Carlos Roberto,Vicente Fábio Bossoi,Stavropoulos Andreas,Zangrando Mariana Schutzer Ragghianti,Sant’Ana Adriana Campos Passanezi
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to investigate the response of osteogenic cell lineage and gingival fibroblastic cells to different surface treatments of grade IV commercially pure Titanium (cpTi) disks.
Material and methods
Grade IV cpTi disks with different surfaces were produced: machined (M), sandblasting (B), sandblasting and acid subtraction (NP), and hydrophilic treatment (ACQ). Surface microtopography characteristics and chemical composition were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry (EDS). Adhesion and proliferation of SC-EHAD (human surgically-created early healing alveolar defects) and HGF-1 (human gingival fibroblasts) on Ti disks were investigated at 24 and 48 h, and osteogenic differentiation and mineralization were evaluated by assessing alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and alizarin red staining, respectively.
Results
No significant differences were found among the various surface treatments for all surface roughness parameters, except for skewness of the assessed profile (Rsk) favoring M (p = 0.035 ANOVA). M disks showed a slightly higher (p > 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn) adhesion of HGF-1 (89.43 ± 9.13%) than SC-EHAD cells (57.11 ± 17.72%). ACQ showed a significantly higher percentage of SC-EHAD (100%) than HGF-1 (69.67 ± 13.97%) cells adhered at 24 h. SC-EHAD cells expressed increased ALP activity in osteogenic medium at M (213%) and NP (235.04%) surfaces, but higher mineralization activity on ACQ (54.94 ± 4.80%) at 14 days.
Conclusion
These findings suggest that surface treatment influences the chemical composition and the adhesion and differentiation of osteogenic cells in vitro.
Clinical relevance
Hydrophilic surface treatment of grade IV cpTi disks influences osteogenic cell adhesion and differentiation, which might enhance osseointegration.
Funder
JJGC Industry and Commerce of Dental Materials – NEODENT
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:155–70.
2. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. The impact of oral implants – past and future, 1966 – 2042. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005;71(5):327.
3. Liu R, Lei T, Dusevich V, Yao X, Liu Y, Walker MP, Wang Y, Ye L. Surface characteristics and cell adhesion: a comparative study of four commercial dental implants. J Prosthod. 2013;22:641–51.
4. Albrektsson T, Jacobsson M. Bone–metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:597–607.
5. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone. Impl Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):172–84.
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献