Effects of various prosthetic methods for patients with Kennedy Class I partial edentulism on oral hypofunction, subjective symptoms, and oral health-related quality of life
-
Published:2024-06-27
Issue:1
Volume:10
Page:
-
ISSN:2198-4034
-
Container-title:International Journal of Implant Dentistry
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Int J Implant Dent
Author:
Morinaga Daisaku,Nagai Shoji,Kaku Toshio,Itoh Takatoshi,Soejima Yoshiki,Takeshita Fumitaka,Horikawa Tadashi,Abe Naruyoshi,Iijima Toshikazu,Soejima Daigo,Hara Toshihiro,Sato Ryuta,Murakami Mamoru,Sawase Takashi,Nishimura Masahiro
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
This propensity score matching, multicenter, cross-sectional study was performed to examine the effects of various prosthetic methods for dental clinic outpatients with Kennedy Class I partial edentulism (KCIPE) on oral hypofunction, subjective frailty symptoms, and oral health-related quality of life (QOL).
Methods
Patients (n = 348) were classified into the following three groups for analysis: NT, patients with natural dentition providing intermaxillary contact in four occlusal supporting zones; RPD, patients with KCIPE who received removable partial dentures; and ISFP, patients with KCIPE who received implant-supported fixed prostheses. Participants' basic characteristics were recorded, and oral function tests were conducted. Subjective symptoms of physical and oral frailty were investigated via questionnaire. Oral health-related QOL was assessed using the Japanese short version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-JP16). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for patient background factors that could influence oral hypofunction in each group.
Results
Compared with the ISFP group, the RPD group had significantly higher rates of poor oral hygiene, reduced occlusal force, decreased masticatory function, and declines in swallowing function and oral hypofunction; the odds ratio for oral hypofunction was 4.67. Compared with the ISFP group, the RPD group had significantly greater subjective symptoms of physical frailty and oral frailty, as well as higher OHIP scores.
Conclusions
Prosthetic treatment of KCIPE affected oral hypofunction, subjective frailty symptoms, and oral health-related QOL in dental clinic outpatients.
Funder
Research grant from the Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology. 2002;19:3–4.
2. Lacono VJ, Cochran DL. State of the science on implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:7–226.
3. Maeda Y. Reading the debate on the selection between fix and removable implant superstructure for maxillary. Ann Jpn Prosthodont Soc. 2019;11:233–8.
4. Mendonca DB, Prado MM, Mendes FA, de Borges TF, Mendonça G, do Prado CJ, et al. Comparison of masticatory function between subjects with three types of dentition. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:399–404.
5. Akagawa Y, Okane H, Kondo N, Tsuga K, Tsuru H. Comparative evaluation of chewing function with removable partial dentures and fixed prostheses supported by the single-crystal sapphire implant in the Kennedy Class II partially edentulous mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:205–10.