Biomarkers as ecological indices in monitoring the status of market fish
-
Published:2023-01-10
Issue:1
Volume:84
Page:
-
ISSN:2090-990X
-
Container-title:The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JoBAZ
Author:
Nagarani N.ORCID, Krishnaveni G., Dharshini V. Dhivya, Manohari K. Gowri, Jeyapandi Monisha Archana, Mariappan Pandiselvi Vinothini, Sangeetha R.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Environmental contamination has become a major concern over the past few decades, drawing the attention of numerous researchers from both developed and developing nations. The aquatic system serves as the primary sink for the disposal of garbage, which has a negative impact on the aquatic environment and biota. The reality is that heavy metals cannot be totally removed from the ecosystem because they can bioaccumulate and grow in strength as they move up the food chain. Particularly heavy metals can build up in the tissues of aquatic animals, and as a result, tissue concentrations of heavy metals may be harmful to both human and animal health. Our study aimed to elucidate the possible use of biomarkers in monitoring and assessing the heavy metals contaminants among fresh water fish.
Results
From the present study, we conclude that glutathione peroxidase can be used as the bioindicator for nickel and iron contamination. Ultimately, these studies focus on measuring levels of pollution that may induce irreversible ecological changes to aquatic ecosystems. Till now the level of toxicity was moderate, and it was progressing toward the danger. Efforts can be made to control the activities that release pollutants unnaturally into the environment from both public and government so that the clean and clear environment can be maintained.
Conclusions
The work concludes that a multiparameter analysis is needed to assess and monitor the ecological status of the aquatic environment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Computer Science
Reference32 articles.
1. Abhijith, B. D., Ramesh, M., & Poopal, R. K. (2016). Responses of metabolic and antioxidant enzymatic activities in gill, liver and plasma of Catla catla during methyl parathion exposure. The Journal of Basic & Applied Zoology, 77, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobaz.2015.11.002 2. Afshan, S., Ali, S., Ameen, U. S., Farid, M., Bharwana, S. A., Hannan, F., & Ahmad, R. (2014). Effect of different heavy metal pollution on fish. Research Journal of Chemical and Environmental Sciences, 2(1), 74–79. 3. Al-Yousuf, M. H., El-Shahawi, M. S., & Al-Ghais, S. M. (2000). Trace metals in liver, skin and muscle of Lethrinus lentjan fish species in relation to body length and sex. Science of Total Environment, 256, 87–94. 4. Anh, P. T., Kroeze, C., Bush, S. R., & Mol, A. P. J. (2010). Water pollution by intensive brackish shrimp farming in south-east Vietnam: Causes and options for control. Agricultural Water Management, 97(6), 872–882. 5. Arkoosh, M. R., Boylen, D., Dietrich, J., Anulacion, B. F., Ylitalo, G., Bravo, C. F., & Johnson, L. L. (2010). Disease susceptibility of salmon exposed to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). AquaticToxicology, 98(1), 51–59.
|
|