Author:
Pradhan Chiranjiv,Giri Shiba Shankar,Mohanty Satyandra Nath,Nayak Khiroda Chandra
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aquaculture sector is the biggest consumer of fishmeal and the demand of this ingredient is higher than the production. The replacement of fishmeal from aquafeed is a current research thrust. The replacement of fishmeal has been possible with plant ingredients in many fish species, however, possesses some limitations in terms of low digestibility and inadequate nutrient profile.
Results
Complete replacement of fishmeal in the diets of Cirrihinus mrigala was studied using specially designed nutrient digestibility system. Two feeds were prepared, one with fishmeal as one of the ingredients (control feed) and another with complete plant ingredients (test feed). Initially, forty C. mrigala fingerlings with average weight of 10.88 ± 0.17 g were stocked in six tanks. Fish were fed up to satiation twice daily (10:00 and 16:30 h) for a period of 45 days. After 1 week of acclimatization, fecal samples were collected for 45 days. At the end of the experiment, no significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed for somatic and serum parameters in two treatments. The digestibility coefficient of dry matter, protein, lipid and energy, and three digestive enzymes; amylase, proteases, and lipase did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) between the treatments. The whole body proximate compositions were similar between the treatments. The test diet (containing linseed oil) fed group exhibited higher proportions of whole body linolenic acid (ALA, 18:3n-3). However, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3) did not vary in both studied treatments.
Conclusion
The information obtained from this study revealed that fishmeal can be completely replaced from the diet of C. mrigala without affecting their growth and nutrient digestibility and fatty acid composition.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Acharya, G., & Mohanty, P. K. (2019). Effect of two different habitat on haematological parameters of fishes of Odisha. Comparative Clinical Pathology, 28, 321–330.
2. Adekoya, A., Porcadilla, M., Varga, D., & Kucska, B. (2018). Replacing fish meal with alternative protein sources in common carp’s feed. Acta agraria aposváriensis, 22(2), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.31914/aak.2283.
3. Aksnes, A., Hope, B., Høstmark, Ø., & Albrektsen, S. (2006). Inclusion level of size fractionated fish hydrolysate in high plant protein diets for Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua. Aquaculture, 261, 1102-1110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.07.038
4. AOAC (1998). Official methods of analysis, (16th ed., ). Arlington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
5. Bergmeyer, H. L. (1974). Methods of enzymatic analysis, (vol. 1-4, 2nd ed., ). New York: Academic Press.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献