Exploring the status of argumentative essay writing strategies and problems of Iranian EFL learners

Author:

Mallahi Omid

Abstract

AbstractThe present study explores the status of argumentative essay writing strategy use and identifies the problems a convenient sample of Iranian EFL learners face while writing argumentative essays in English. Adopting a complementary process-genre approach and a mixed-methods research design, the researcher designed a genre-specific argumentative essay-writing strategy use questionnaire and pilot-tested it in an essay-writing course. The necessary data were collected using the designed questionnaire, students' argumentative texts written in the classes and their responses to the open-ended survey and semi-structured interviews. The results indicated a rather low status of strategy use in the sample since the students mostly depended on their previous writing competencies rather than following the conventions of working on this new genre of writing. The results of the open-ended survey, semi-structured interviews, and the analyses of students' argumentative texts indicated significant problems in the students' essay writing performance, categorized as cognitive, linguistic and discourse, and psychological problems, which were further attributed to the newness and complexities imposed by this genre of writing, students’ inadequate linguistic and discourse competence and their inefficient use of writing strategies. Finally, it was suggested that to assist the students in writing better argumentative texts, writing instructors must ensure students have a fundamental understanding of what an argument is, including the components like claims, evidence, warrants and counterarguments, and encourage critical thinking by teaching students how to evaluate evidence, find logical fallacies and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of different arguments. They also need to share well-written argumentative essays as models for students to analyze and learn from, incorporate strategy instruction in their practices, offer further opportunities for writing and practicing in this genre of writing, and provide appropriate scaffolding and timely feedback on the students’ argumentative writing performance.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3