Author:
Seddiq Khaled,Enarson Donald A,Shah Karam,Haq Zaeem,Khan Wasiq M
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Afghanistan has faced health consequences of war including those due to displacement of populations, breakdown of health and social services, and increased risks of disease transmission for over three decades. Yet it was able to restructure its National Tuberculosis Control Programme (NTP), integrate tuberculosis treatment into primary health care and achieve most of its targets by the year 2011. What were the processes that enabled the programme to achieve its targets? More importantly, what were the underpinning factors that made this success possible? We addressed these important questions through a case study.
Case description
We adopted a processes and outcomes framework for this study, which began with examining the change in key programme indicators, followed by backwards tracing of the processes and underlying factors, responsible for this change. Methods included review of the published and grey literature along with in-depth interviews of 15 key informants involved with the care of tuberculosis patients in Afghanistan.
Discussion and evaluation
TB incidence and mortality per 100,000 decreased from 325 and 92 to 189 and 39 respectively, while case notification and treatment success improved during the decade under study. Efficient programme structures were enabled through high political commitment from the Government, strong leadership from the programme, effective partnership and coordination among stakeholders, and adequate technical and financial support from the development partners.
Conclusions
The NTP Afghanistan is an example that public health programmes can be effectively implemented in fragile states. High political commitment and strong local leadership are essential factors for such programmes. To ensure long-term effectiveness of the NTP, the international support should be withdrawn in a phased manner, coupled with a sequential increase in resources allocated to the NTP by the Government of Afghanistan.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health(social science)
Reference31 articles.
1. Murray CJL, King G, Lopez AD, Tomijima N, Krug EG: Armed conflict as a public health problem. Br Med J. 2002, 324: 346-349. 10.1136/bmj.324.7333.346.
2. Gele A, Bjune G: Armed conflicts have an impact on the spread of tuberculosis: the case of the Somali Regional State of Ethiopia. Confl Health. 2010, 4: 1-10.1186/1752-1505-4-1.
3. Waters H, Garrett B, Burnham G: Rehabilitating health systems in post-conflict situations. 2007, Helsinki: UNU World Inst. for Development Economics Research (UNU/WIDER)
4. Ohiorhenuan JF, Stewart F: Crisis Prevention and Recovery Report 2008: Post-conflict Economic Recovery, Enabling Local Ingenuity. 2009, New York: United Nations Development library
5. Collier PHA: Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxf Econ Pap. 2004, 56: 563-595. 10.1093/oep/gpf064.