Author:
Fernandes Mateus,Milla Cristian,Gubran Ahmed,Barrazueta Sandra,Altonen Brian,DiVittis Anthony,Rashmi Prama,Bess Olva,Asif Haris,Nwachukwu Ifediba,Aroyewun Opeyemi,Martinez Alberto,Kuperberg Stephen,
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Lower socioeconomic status has been identified as an emerging risk factor for health disparities, including lung cancer outcomes. Most research investigating these outcomes includes patients from formal lung cancer screening programs. There is a paucity of studies assessing the relationship between socioeconomic status and incidental lung nodules. This study aimed to investigate the association between socioeconomic status and the size of incidental lung nodules on initial presentation at an urban safety net hospital, which did not have a formal lung cancer screening program or incidental lung nodule program.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with incidental lung nodules on CT chest imaging who were referred from primary care to a pulmonology clinic at a safety net hospital. Patients with incomplete nodule characteristics information were excluded. Data on demographics, comorbidities, smoking history, insurance type, immigration status, and geographical factors were collected. Less commonly studied determinants such as crime index, cost of living, and air quality index were also assessed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess relationships between nodule size and socioeconomic determinants.
Results
Out of 3,490 patients with chest CT scans, 268 patients with ILNs were included in the study. 84.7% of patients represented racial or ethnic minorities, and most patients (67.8%) had federal insurance. Patients with non-commercial insurance were more likely to have larger, inherently higher-risk nodules (> 8 mm) compared to those with commercial insurance (OR 2.18, p 0.01). Patients from areas with higher unemployment rates were also less likely (OR 0.75, p 0.04) to have smaller nodules (< 6 mm). Patients representing racial or ethnic minorities were also more likely to have nodules > 8 mm (OR 1.6, p 0.24), and less likely to have nodules < 6 mm (OR 0.6, p 0.32), however, these relationships were not statistically significant.
Conclusion
This study found that lower socioeconomic status, indicated by having non-commercial insurance, was associated with larger incidental lung nodule size on initial presentation. While it is established that socioeconomic status is associated with disparities in lung cancer screening, these findings suggest that inequalities may also be present in those with incidental lung nodules. Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and develop interventions to address these disparities in incidental lung nodule evaluation and improve outcomes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Reference34 articles.
1. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version. National Cancer Institute. Updated November 18, 2020. Accessed March 6th 2023. https://www.cancer.gov/types/lung/hp/non-small-cell-lung-treatment-pdq
2. Adams SJ, Stone E, Baldwin DR, Vliegenthart R, Lee P, Fintelmann FJ. Lung cancer screening. Lancet (London, England). 2023;401(10374):390–408.
3. Potter AL, Bajaj SS, Yang C-FJ. The 2021 USPSTF lung cancer screening guidelines: a new frontier. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(7):689–91.
4. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2016. National Cancer Institute; 2019. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/
5. National Lung Screening Trial Research T, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409.