Author:
Hai Cong Nguyen,Duc Thanh Bui,Minh The Nguyen,Quang Lich Ngo,Tung Son Luong Cao,Duc Loi Trinh,Duong-Quy Sy
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite global efforts to control the COVID-19 pandemic, the emergence of new viral strains continues to pose a significant threat. Accurate patient stratification, optimized resource allocation, and appropriate treatment are crucial in managing COVID-19 cases. To address this, a simple and accurate prognostic tool capable of rapidly identifying individuals at high risk of mortality is urgently needed. Early prognosis facilitates predicting treatment outcomes and enables effective patient management. The aim of this study was to develop an early predictive model for assessing mortality risk in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, utilizing baseline clinical factors.
Methods
We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study involving a cohort of 375 COVID-19 patients admitted and treated at the COVID-19 Patient Treatment Center in Military Hospital 175 from October 2021 to December 2022.
Results
Among the 375 patients, 246 and 129 patients were categorized into the survival and mortality groups, respectively. Our findings revealed six clinical factors that demonstrated independent predictive value for mortality in COVID-19 patients. These factors included age greater than 50 years, presence of multiple underlying diseases, dyspnea, acute confusion, saturation of peripheral oxygen below 94%, and oxygen demand exceeding 5 L per minute. We integrated these factors to develop the Military Hospital 175 scale (MH175), a prognostic scale demonstrating significant discriminatory ability with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87. The optimal cutoff value for predicting mortality risk using the MH175 score was determined to be ≥ 3 points, resulting in a sensitivity of 96.1%, specificity of 63.4%, positive predictive value of 58%, and negative predictive value of 96.9%.
Conclusions
The MH175 scale demonstrated a robust predictive capacity for assessing mortality risk in patients with COVID-19. Implementation of the MH175 scale in clinical settings can aid in patient stratification and facilitate the application of appropriate treatment strategies, ultimately reducing the risk of death. Therefore, the utilization of the MH175 scale holds significant potential to improve clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.
Trial registration
An independent ethics committee approved the study (Research Ethics Committee of Military Hospital 175 (No. 3598GCN-HDDD; date: October 8, 2021), which was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference18 articles.
1. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int. Accessed: 04/12/2023.
2. Coronavirus Death Rate (COVID-19) - Worldometer. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-rate/. Accessed: 03/06/2023.
3. Mouliou DS, Gourgoulianis KI. COVID-19 “asymptomatic” patients: an old wives’ tale. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2022;16(4):399–407.
4. Mouliou DS, Pantazopoulos I, Gourgoulianis KI. COVID-19 Smart Diagnosis in the Emergency Department: all-in in Practice. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2022;16(3):263–72.
5. Ministry of Health of Vietnam. 4689/QD-BYT: Guidance on Diagnosis and Treatment of COVID-19. Hanoi: Ministry of Health of Vietnam; 2021. https://vncdc.gov.vn/mediacenter/media/files/1012/102021/203_1633700418_55461604a42caeeb.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2023.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献