Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is global interest in finding innovative solutions that address current climate and societal challenges in an urban context. Cities are often on the front lines of environmental change, meaning urban greening strategies have high potential to provide benefits across human communities, while protecting global biodiversity. There is growing consensus that nature-based solutions can provide multiple benefits to people and nature while also mitigating the effects of climate change. Urban forest management is well-suited to a nature-based solutions framework due to the wide variety of services trees provide our communities. Effective approaches to urban forest management also have the potential to promote other forms of urban biodiversity, particularly birds and species at risk. However, studies that integrate strategies for both climate and biodiversity conservation are rare. The goal of this systematic map is to gather and describe information on two desired outcomes of urban forest management: (1) conserving avian diversity and species at risk (2) carbon storage and sequestration (i.e., nature-based climate solutions).
Methods
We will identify relevant articles from two separate searches for inclusion in our systematic map that address (1) urban forestry and avian and species at risk conservation and, (2) urban forestry and carbon storage and sequestration. We will search two bibliographic databases, consult 20 relevant organizational websites, and solicit grey literature through an open call for evidence. Eligibility screening will be conducted at two stages: (1) title and abstract and (2) full text. Relevant information from included papers will be extracted and entered in a searchable, coded database. Synthesis of evidence will describe the key characteristics of each study (e.g., geographic locations, interventions, outcomes, species studied) and identify knowledge gaps and clusters of evidence. Our systematic map will guide further research on opportunities for multiple benefits using nature-based solutions, particularly as they relate to urban forest management. Furthermore, our evidence base will support both management and funding decisions to ensure the effective use of resources for maximum benefits across people and ecosystems.
Funder
Federal Department of Environment and Climate Change
Concordia University- Research Chair in Urban Ecology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,Ecology
Reference38 articles.
1. Government of Canada, Statistics Canada. (2020) Canada’s population estimates: Subprovincial areas, July 1, 2020. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/210114/dq210114a-eng.htm?HPA=1. Accessed 2 Mar 2022.
2. Lantz N, Grenier M, Wang J. Urban greenness, 2001, 2011 and 2019. Government of Canada; 2021.
3. Kerr JT, Cihlar J. Patterns and causes of species endangerment in Canada. Ecol Appl. 2004;14:743–53.
4. Coristine LE, Kerr JT. Habitat loss, climate change, and emerging conservation challenges in Canada. Can J Zool. 2011;89:435–51.
5. Childers DL, Pickett STA, Grove JM, Ogden L, Whitmer A. Advancing urban sustainability theory and action: Challenges and opportunities. Landsc Urban Plan. 2014;125:320–8.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献