Author:
da Silva Paulo Henrique,Ferreira Júnior Washington Soares,Zank Sofia,do Nascimento André Luiz Borba,de Abreu Maria Carolina
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Local medical systems (LMS) include native and exotic plants used for the treatment of diseases of physical and spiritual nature. The incorporation of exotic plants into these systems has been the subject of many studies. In this context, an analysis was conducted on the influence of the origin of plants on diseases of physical and spiritual nature in order to evaluate the therapeutic versatility of native and exotic species in these therapeutic targets, to investigate whether exotic plants mainly fill gaps not met by native plants (diversification hypothesis), and identify which species are prioritized in the redundant targets in these two therapeutic groups in the rural community of Morrinhos, Monsenhor Hipólito, Piauí.
Methods
Data collection took place in 2 stages. First, free lists and semi-structured interviews with local residents (n = 134) were conducted to survey plants used for therapeutic purposes and the associated illnesses. Then, another phase of interviews was carried out to evaluate the prioritization between native and exotic plants in redundant therapeutic targets. To test the diversification hypothesis (DH) in each group of illnesses, data were analyzed using generalized linear models (Poisson and Binomial GLMs); versatility was measured by the number of therapeutic indications and compared between resources using the Mann–Whitney test, and prioritization in each group was verified by comparing the proportions of native and exotic plants with the χ2 test.
Results
One hundred and thirty-two species of plants were surveyed, being 71 exotic and 61 native, with indications for physical and spiritual illnesses. The results revealed that the diversification hypothesis did not explain the inclusion of exotic plants in the local medical system to treat physical or spiritual illnesses and that the therapeutic versatility of exotic and native resources in the two groups was also similar (p > 0.05). However, exotic plants were prioritized in illnesses with physical causes and native plants in illnesses with spiritual causes.
Conclusions
The local medical system presents similar and distinct patterns in the therapeutic targets, depending on the perspective evaluated. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the patterns of use of medicinal plants in different sociocultural contexts in order to broaden the debate about the role of plant origin in the selection of treatments for illnesses with different causes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference73 articles.
1. Freitas AVL, Coelho MFBC, Maia SSS, Azevedo RAB. Plantas medicinais: um estudo etnobotânico nos quintais do Sítio Cruz, São Miguel, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil. R Bras Bioci. 2012;10(1):48–59.
2. Kleinman A. Concepts and a model for the comparison of medical systems as cultural systems. Soc Sci Med. 1978;12(2):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7987(78)90014-5.
3. Araújo TAS, Melo JG, Ferreira Júnior WS, Albuquerque UP. Plantas medicinais. In: Albuquerque UP, Alves RRN, editors. Introdução à etnobiologia. 2nd ed. Recife: NUPPEA; 2018. p. 147–55.
4. Albuquerque UP. Re-examining hypotheses concerning the use and knowledge of medicinal plants: a study in the caatinga vegetation of NE Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006;2(30):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-2-30.
5. Albuquerque UP, Oliveira RF. Is the use-impact on native caatinga species in Brazil reduced by the high species richness of medicinal plants? J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;113(1):156–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.05.025.