Abstract
Abstract
Background
Maternal and neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries is frequently caused by inadequate management of obstetric and neonatal complications and a shortage of skilled health workers. The availability of these workers is essential for effective and high-quality healthcare. To meet the needs of sexual, reproductive, maternal, new-born, child, and adolescent health by 2030, more than one million health workers, including 900 000 midwives, are required globally. Despite this, uncertainty persists regarding the return on investment in the health workforce.
Methods
The objective of this research was to determine the cost-benefit ratio of increasing investment in midwifery in Morocco from 2021 to 2030. A comparative analysis was conducted between scenarios “with” and “without” the additional investment. The costs and benefits were estimated using relevant data from national and international sources.
Results
Following the International Confederation of Midwives’ recommendations, it is advised that Morocco recruit 760 midwives annually to achieve 95% of universal health coverage. This increase in midwifery could result in saving 120 593 lives by 2030, including reducing maternal deaths by 3 201, stillbirths by 48 399, and neonatal deaths by 68 993. The estimated economic benefit of investing in midwives was US$ 10 152 287 749, while the total cost was US$ 638 288 820. Consequently, the cost-benefit ratio was calculated as 15.91, indicating that investing in midwifery would provide 16 times more benefits than costs.
Conclusion
Increasing investment in midwifery appears to be an efficient strategy for achieving comprehensive maternal and child health coverage in low- and middle-income countries.
Funder
United Nations Population Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. United Nations Population Fund. Maternal mortality update. 2004. Available on: https://www.unfpa.org/publications/maternal-mortality-update-2004. Accessed 14 December 2022.
2. Fauveau V, Sherratt D, de Bernis L. Human resources for maternal health: multipurpose or specialists? Hum Resour Health. 2008;6(1):21.
3. Dussault G. Framework for health workforce analysis. Ruptures Transdisciplinary Health Journal. 2001;7(2):64–78.
4. Dubois CA, Singh D. From staff-mix to skill-mix and beyond: towards a systemic approach to health workforce management. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7(1):87.
5. United Nations Population Fund. Fact sheet: the state of the world’s midwifery. 2014. Available on: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/resource-pdf/Fact%20Sheet_SoWMy%20-%20FINAL%20-%20May%2029%202014%20%281%29.pdf. Accesses 10 December 2022.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献