Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Antibiotics are one possible treatment for patients with recurrent acute throat infections (ATI), but effectiveness can be modest. In view of worries over antibiotic resistance, treatment pathways that reduce recurrence of ATI are essential from a public health perspective. Integrative treatment strategies can be an option but there is still a high demand to provide evidence of their cost effectiveness.
Methods
We constructed a 4-state Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of SilAtro-5-90 as adjuvant homeopathic therapy to care as usual with care as usual alone in reducing the recurrence of ATI for children and adults with suspected moderate recurrent tonsillitis. The analysis was performed from a societal perspective in Germany over a 2-year period. Results are reported separately for children < 12 and for individuals aged 12 and over. The model draws on evidence from a multi-centre randomised clinical trial that found this strategy effective in reducing recurrence of ATI. Costs in 2019 € and outcomes after 1 year are discounted at a rate of 3% per annum.
Results
For adults and adolescents aged 12 years and over, incremental cost per ATI averted in the adjuvant therapy group was €156.64. If individuals enter the model on average with a history of 3.33 previous ATIs, adjuvant therapy has both lower costs and better outcomes than care as usual. For children (< 12 years) adjuvant therapy had both lower costs and ATI than care as usual. The economic case is stronger if adjuvant treatment reduces surgical referral. At a hypothetical cost per ATI averted threshold of €1000 probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggests Silatro-5-90 has a 65% (adults) and 71% (children) chance of being cost-effective.
Conclusion
Our results indicate the importance of considering homeopathy as adjuvant therapy in the treatment of ATIs in individuals with recurrent tonsillitis from a socio-economic perspective. Further evaluation should assess how differences in uptake and sustained use of homeopathic adjuvant therapy, as well as changing patterns of antibiotic prescribing, impact on cost effectiveness.
Funder
This research was funded by Deutsche Homöopathie-Union (DHU), DHU-Arzneimittel GmbH. & Co.KG, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Private Universität Witten/Herdecke gGmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Fendrick AM, Saint S, Brook I, Jacobs MR, Pelton S, Sethi S. Diagnosis and treatment of upper respiratory tract infections in the primary care setting. Clin Ther. 2001;23(10):1683–706.
2. Johnson BC, Alvi A. Cost-effective workup for tonsillitis: testing, treatment, and potential complications. Postgrad Med. 2003;113(3):115–21.
3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2018). Sore throat (acute): antimicrobial prescribing. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng84. Accessed 29 July 2020.
4. Spurling GKP, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, Foxlee R, Farley R. Delayed antibiotic prescription for respiratory infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub5.
5. Fixsen A. Homeopathy in the age of antimicrobial resistance: is it a viable treatment for upper respiratory tract infections? Homeopathy. 2018;107:99–114.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献