Efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan

Author:

Farewar FarhadORCID,Saeed Khwaja Mir Ahad,Foshanji Abo Ismael,Alawi Said Mohammad Karim,Zawoli Mohammad Yonus,Irit Sinai,Zeng Wu

Abstract

Abstract Background Afghanistan’s health system is unique in that primary healthcare is delivered by non-governmental organizations funded by multilateral or bilateral donors, not the government. Given the wide range of implementers providing the basic package of health services, there may be performance differences in service delivery. This study assessed the relative technical efficiency of different levels of primary healthcare services and explored its determinants. Method Data envelopment analysis was used to assess the relative technical efficiency of three levels of primary healthcare facilities (comprehensive, basic, and sub-health centers). The inputs included personnel and capital expenditure, while the outputs were measured by the number of facility visits. Data on inputs and outputs were obtained from national health information databases for 1263 healthcare facilities in 31 provinces. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the correlation of various elements with efficiency scores. Regression models were used to identify potential factors associated with efficiency scores at the health facility level. Results The average efficiency score of health facilities was 0.74 when pooling all 1,263 health facilities, with 102 health facilities (8.1%) having efficiency scores of 1 (100% efficient). The lowest quintile of health facilities had an average efficiency score of 0.36, while the highest quintile had a score of 0.96. On average, efficiency scores of comprehensive health centers were higher than basic and sub-health centers by 0.11 and .07, respectively. In addition, the difference between efficiency scores of facilities in the highest and lowest quintiles was highest in facilities that offer fewer services. Thus, they have the largest room for improvement. Conclusions Our findings show that public health facilities in Afghanistan that provide more comprehensive primary health services use their resources more efficiently and that smaller facilities have more room for improvement. A more integrated delivery model would help improve the efficiency of providing primary healthcare in Afghanistan.

Funder

The study was technically supported by USAID funded Health System Resiliency (HSR) project. Data collection conducted by the MOPH staff.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference14 articles.

1. Afghanistan Ministry of Public Health (MoPH). Afghanistan National Health Accounts, Report. Kabul: MoPH; 2017.

2. Afghanistan Ministry of Public Health (MoPH). Potential avenues increase government investment in health in Afghanistan: Fiscal space analysis. Kabul: Ministry of Public Health; 2016.

3. Afghanistan Ministry of Public Health (MoPH). MOPH health financing strategy 2016–2020. Kabul: MoPH; 2016.

4. Das JK, Akseer N, Mirzazada S, Peera Z, Noorzada O, Armstrong CE, Mukhtar K, Naeem AJ, Bhutta ZA. Scaling up primary health services for improving reproductive, maternal, and child health: a multisectoral collaboration in the conflict setting of Afghanistan. BMJ. 2018;363: k4986.

5. Blaakman A, Lwin A. Afghanistan basic package of health services: cost-efficiency, quality, equity and stakeholder insights into contracting modalities. Washington: Health Policy Project; 2013.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3