Abstract
Abstract
Background
Afghanistan’s health system is unique in that primary healthcare is delivered by non-governmental organizations funded by multilateral or bilateral donors, not the government. Given the wide range of implementers providing the basic package of health services, there may be performance differences in service delivery. This study assessed the relative technical efficiency of different levels of primary healthcare services and explored its determinants.
Method
Data envelopment analysis was used to assess the relative technical efficiency of three levels of primary healthcare facilities (comprehensive, basic, and sub-health centers). The inputs included personnel and capital expenditure, while the outputs were measured by the number of facility visits. Data on inputs and outputs were obtained from national health information databases for 1263 healthcare facilities in 31 provinces. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the correlation of various elements with efficiency scores. Regression models were used to identify potential factors associated with efficiency scores at the health facility level.
Results
The average efficiency score of health facilities was 0.74 when pooling all 1,263 health facilities, with 102 health facilities (8.1%) having efficiency scores of 1 (100% efficient). The lowest quintile of health facilities had an average efficiency score of 0.36, while the highest quintile had a score of 0.96. On average, efficiency scores of comprehensive health centers were higher than basic and sub-health centers by 0.11 and .07, respectively. In addition, the difference between efficiency scores of facilities in the highest and lowest quintiles was highest in facilities that offer fewer services. Thus, they have the largest room for improvement.
Conclusions
Our findings show that public health facilities in Afghanistan that provide more comprehensive primary health services use their resources more efficiently and that smaller facilities have more room for improvement. A more integrated delivery model would help improve the efficiency of providing primary healthcare in Afghanistan.
Funder
The study was technically supported by USAID funded Health System Resiliency (HSR) project. Data collection conducted by the MOPH staff.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Afghanistan Ministry of Public Health (MoPH). Afghanistan National Health Accounts, Report. Kabul: MoPH; 2017.
2. Afghanistan Ministry of Public Health (MoPH). Potential avenues increase government investment in health in Afghanistan: Fiscal space analysis. Kabul: Ministry of Public Health; 2016.
3. Afghanistan Ministry of Public Health (MoPH). MOPH health financing strategy 2016–2020. Kabul: MoPH; 2016.
4. Das JK, Akseer N, Mirzazada S, Peera Z, Noorzada O, Armstrong CE, Mukhtar K, Naeem AJ, Bhutta ZA. Scaling up primary health services for improving reproductive, maternal, and child health: a multisectoral collaboration in the conflict setting of Afghanistan. BMJ. 2018;363: k4986.
5. Blaakman A, Lwin A. Afghanistan basic package of health services: cost-efficiency, quality, equity and stakeholder insights into contracting modalities. Washington: Health Policy Project; 2013.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献