Abstract
AbstractScholarship remains divided about whether emotional labor is ‘skilled’. Interrogating gendered skill constructs that render emotions in work invisible, I examine two organizational contexts in the Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) sector: family and center-based care. I draw from 43 interviews, primarily with Latina and White women workers, reflecting feminized and racialized workplaces. I also draw from ethnographic and observational data. Challenging the particular devaluation of family-based care, findings reveal that the practice of skill in emotional labor is organizationally shaped across less and more institutionalized forms of ECEC. Examining worker critiques of professionalization norms and credential-based skill metrics, autonomy is also identified as a pre-requisite for embodied, tacit and discretionary skills in the emotional labor of ECEC.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Community and Home Care,Pediatrics,Sociology and Political Science,Education,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference77 articles.
1. Acker, J. (1989). Doing comparable worth: Gender, class and pay equity. Temple University Press.
2. Armenia, A. (2006). Caregivers, Workers, Professionals: Challenges and Strategies of Family Day Care Providers. Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
3. Armenia, A. (2009). More than Motherhood: Reasons for Becoming a Family Day Care Provider. Journal of Family Issues., 30(4), 554–574.
4. Attewell, P. (1990). What is Skill? Work and Occupations, 17(4), 422–448.
5. Ben, G. (2010). Emotional Labor, Gender and Professional Stereotypes of Emotional and Physical Contact, and Personal Perspectives on the Emotional Labor of Nursing. Journal of Gender Studies, 19(4), 349–360.