Abstract
AbstractThis paper simulates the likely fiscal and employment effects of a vast public annual investment programme of free universal high-quality early childhood education and care (ECEC) services in the UK. It examines the extent to which it would pay for itself fiscally for different scenarios of pay increases. Investing in high-quality universal ECEC benefits all children by improving their life chances, especially for those living in lower income families. It also generates larger employment effects than other more typical investment policies such as construction projects and fosters gender equality in employment: not only it provides many high-quality jobs for women, it also allows many mothers to improve their lifetime earnings prospects by freeing up their childcare constraints. This in turn has beneficial fiscal revenue effects for the government. Estimations of annual public expenditure for a system of highly qualified and well-paid childcare staff with low child-to-staff ratios are performed, with universal coverage for all pre-school children aged 6 months to 4.5 years. Labour demand and matching supply effects are also simulated using input–output methods, for different take-up rates of the programme. A microsimulation tool is used to calculate increases in household income and tax liabilities and decreases in social security benefits spending. This results in a net annual funding requirement of between 28 and 39% of the gross investment. Two funding methods are then explored: raising taxation in a progressive way and recouping the cost over time from persistent mothers’ increased earnings. The former would entail a net additional contribution by the richest 20% of households of at most 0.4% of their income; the latter would require 21 to 31 years to offset the programme on average, which is within a typical working life-course following a first child’s birth, of 35 years.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Community and Home Care,Pediatrics,Sociology and Political Science,Education,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference69 articles.
1. Allen, R., Belfield, C., Greaves E., Sharp, C., & Walker, M. (2016). The longer-term costs and benefits of different initial teacher training routes. Report R118, 15 July, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies. https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/8368. Accessed 10 Mar 2017.
2. Andresen, M. E., & Havnes, T. (2018). Child care, parental labor supply and tax revenue. Labour Economics, 61, 101762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.101762
3. Antonopoulos, R., Kim, K., Masterson, T., & Zacharias, A. (2011). Investing in care: A strategy for effective and equitable job creation. Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. 610.
4. Aran, M. A., Munoz-Boudet, A. M., & Aktakke, N. (2018). Building an ex-ante simulation model for estimating the capacity impact, benefit incidence, and cost effectiveness of child care subsidies in Turkey. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 12, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-018-0052-3
5. Babchishin, L., Weegar, K., & Romano, E. (2013). Early child care effects on later behavioral outcomes using a Canadian nation-wide sample. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3(2), 15–29.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献