Abstract
Abstract
Background
In the context of rheumatoid arthritis and its systemic inflammatory implications, there is an increasing interest in investigating the role of prolactin in the clinical and metabolic aspects of the disease. This study aimed to explore the potential links between serum prolactin levels, serum glucose levels, and the clinical manifestations of arthritis.
Methods
This exploratory, cross-sectional, observational study focused on women diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. The research involved assessing prolactin and blood glucose concentrations, alongside specific clinical traits such as disease-related inflammation, morning stiffness, and fatigue intensity. The presence of changes in serum prolactin (PRL) was initially compared among the groups based on disease activity intensity. Using a multinomial regression analysis, the study analyzed the impact of predetermined clinical and metabolic factors on various categories of prolactin concentration.
Results
Out of the 72 participants included in the study, hyperprolactinemia was detected in 9.1% of the sample. No differences in serum PRL were identified among the evaluated groups based on disease activity. Following multivariate analysis, no statistically significant differences were identified for the outcomes of inflammatory activity and morning stiffness within each PRL category when compared to the reference category for PRL. There was no increased likelihood of encountering blood glucose levels below 100 mg/dl among individuals with higher prolactin concentrations compared to those in the lowest prolactin category (OR 5.43, 95% CI 0.51–58.28). The presence of clinically significant fatigue revealed a higher likelihood of encountering this outcome among patients with intermediate PRL values (prolactin categories 7.76–10.35 with OR 5.18, 95% CI 1.01–26.38 and 10.36–15.29 with OR 6.25, 95% CI 1.2–32.51) when compared to the reference category.
Conclusions
The study found no discernible correlation between prolactin concentrations and worse scores for inflammatory activity of the disease, nor between prolactin concentrations and serum glucose levels. The findings regarding fatigue should be approached with caution given the exploratory nature of this study.
Funder
Research Support Center at Sabin Laboratory Brasilia, DF
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference79 articles.
1. Herlant M. The cells of the adenohypophysis and their functional significance. In: Bourne GH, Danielli JF, editors. International review of cytology. Buffalo, NY: Elsevier; 1964. pp. 299–382.
2. Gomez E, Turner C. Hypophysectomy and replacement therapy in relation to the growth and secretory activity of the mammary gland [dissertation/master´s thesis]. Columbia (SC): University of Missouri; 1937.
3. Freeman ME, Kanyicska B, Lerant A, Nagy G. Prolactin: structure, function, and regulation of secretion. Physiol Rev. 2000;80:1523–631. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2000.80.4.1523.
4. Vera-Lastra O, Jara LJ, Espinoza LR. Prolactin and autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2002;1:360–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1568-9972(02)00081-2.
5. Clevenger CV, Rycyzyn MA, Syed F, Kline JB. Prolactin receptor signal transduction. In: Horseman ND, editor. Prolactin. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2001. pp. 355–79.