Client perceptions of the BreastScreen Australia remote radiology assessment model

Author:

Smith DeborahORCID,Johnston Karen,Carlisle Karen,Evans Rebecca,Preston Robyn,Beckett Jessamy,Geddes Danielle,Naess Helen,Poole Melissa,Larkins Sarah

Abstract

Abstract Background Telehealth and teleradiology are increasingly used around the world to facilitate health care provision when the health care provider and clients are separated by distance. The BreastScreen Australia Remote Radiology Assessment Model (RRAM) is an initiative developed to address the challenges of inadequate access to a local radiological workforce in regional Australia. With the growth in telehealth innovations more broadly, the RRAM represents a departure from the traditional onsite model where a radiologist would be co-located with practice staff during assessment clinics. Understanding client satisfaction is an important consideration with new models. This article explores client perceptions of the RRAM including awareness, satisfaction with experiences, confidence in the quality of care being received, and preferences regarding models of service delivery. Methods Clients in four BreastScreen services across three Australian states and territories were invited to provide feedback on their experiences of the RRAM. Brief face-to-face interviews based on a survey were conducted at the conclusion of assessment clinic visits. Clients also provided feedback through surveys completed and returned by post, and online. Results 144 clients completed the survey regarding their experiences of the RRAM. The majority were aged between 50 and 59 years (55/144, 38.2%). Most had attended a BreastScreen service for either screening or assessment on a total of two to five occasions (85/142, 59.9%) in the past. Nearly all women who attended a RRAM clinic expressed satisfaction with their experience (142/143, 99.3%). Clients were aware that the radiologist was working from another location (131/143, 91.6%) and the majority believed there wouldn’t be any difference in the care they received between the RRAM and the onsite model (120/142, 84.5%). Clients generally had no particular preference for either the onsite or RRAM model of service delivery. Conclusions Clients’ high satisfaction with their clinic experiences, high confidence in care being received, and the majority having no preference for either the onsite or remote model indicates their acceptance of the RRAM. Client acceptance of the model supports continuation of the RRAM at these sites and expansion. Findings may inform future telehealth innovations where key health care team members are working remotely.

Funder

Department of Health, Australian Government

Department of Health, Queensland

Department of Health, New South Wales Government

Northern Territory Department of Health

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. BreastScreen Australia monitoring report 2019. [Internet] Cancer series no. 127. Cat. no. CAN 128. Canberra: AIHW. [cited 2020 June 4]. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer-screening/breastscreen-australia-monitoring-report-2019/contents/table-of-contents.

2. World Health Organization. Cancer Key Facts 12 September 2018. [Internet] Geneva: WHO. [cited 2020 June 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer.

3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia 2019. [Internet] Cancer series no. 119. Cat. No. CAN 123. Canberra: AIHW. [cited 2020 June 4]. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-in-australia-2019/contents/table-of-contents.

4. Australian Government Department of Health. BreastScreen Australia. [Internet] Canberra: Department of Health. [cited 2020 June 8]. Available from: http://www.cancerscreening.gov.au/internet/screening/publishing.nsf/Content/breast-screening-1.

5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Medical workforce 2012. [Internet] Canberra: AIHW; 2014. [cited 2020 June 18. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/workforce/medical-workforce-2012/contents/summary

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3