Author:
Raifman Sarah,Gurazada Tanvi,Beaman Jessica,Biggs M. Antonia,Schwarz Eleanor Bimla,Gold Marji,Grossman Daniel
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This qualitative study aims to assess perspectives of clinicians and clinic staff on mail-order pharmacy dispensing for medication abortion.
Methods
Participants included clinicians and staff involved in implementing a mail-order dispensing model for medication abortion at eleven clinics in seven states as part of a prospective cohort study, which began in January 2020 (before the FDA removed the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone). From June 2021 to July 2022, we invited participants at the participating clinics, including six primary care and five abortion clinics, to complete a semi-structured video interview about their experiences. We then conducted qualitative thematic analysis of interview data, summarizing themes related to perceived benefits and concerns about the mail-order model, perceived patient interest, and potential barriers to larger-scale implementation.
Results
We conducted 24 interviews in total with clinicians (13 physicians and one nurse practitioner) and clinic staff (n = 10). Participants highlighted perceived benefits of the mail-order model, including its potential to expand abortion services into primary care, increase patient autonomy and privacy, and to normalize abortion services. They also highlighted key logistical, clinical, and feasibility concerns about the mail-order model, and specific challenges related to integrating abortion into primary care.
Conclusion
Clinicians and clinic staff working in primary care and abortion clinics were optimistic that mail-order dispensing of medication abortion can improve the ability of some providers to provide abortion and enable more patients to access services. The feasibility of mail-order pharmacy dispensing of medication abortion following the Supreme Court Dobbs decision is to be determined.
Trial registration
Registry: Clinicaltrials.gov. Trial registration number: NCT03913104. Date of registration: first submitted on April 3, 2019 and first posted on April 12, 2019.
Funder
Society of Family Planning
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Medication Abortion Now Accounts for More Than Half of All US Abortions. Guttmacher Institute 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2022/02/medication-abortion-now-accounts-more-half-all-us-abortions (accessed June 27, 2023).
2. Cavazzoni P. CDER. Response letter from FDA CDER to American Association of Pro-life obstetricians. and Gynecologists and American College of Pediatricians; 2021.
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. Society of Family Planning. Medication abortion up to 70 days of Gestation: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 225. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136:e31–47.
4. NAF. Clinical Policy guidelines for Abortion Care. National Abortion Federation; 2024.
5. Upadhyay UD, Koenig LR, Meckstroth K, Ko J, Valladares ES, Biggs MA. Effectiveness and safety of telehealth medication abortion in the USA. Nat Med 2024:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02834-w.