Author:
Zou Wenda,Liu Dan,Peng Juan,Tang Zhijing,Li Yukun,Zhang Juan,Liu Ziwei
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To compare the application of sequential embryo transfer, cleavage embryo transfer, and blastocyst transfer combined with intrauterine perfusion in frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles in patients with recurrent implantation failure to provide a reference for reproductive clinicians.
Methods
The 166 patients who underwent frozen–thawed embryo transfer due to recurrent implantation failure in the reproductive center from January 2021 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different embryos transferred, they were divided into cleavage embryo transfer groups (72 cases in Group A), blastocyst transfer group (29 cases in Group B), and sequential transfer group (65 cases in Group C). All three groups were treated with intrauterine perfusion 5 days before embryo transfer. The general data and clinical pregnancy outcome indicators, such as embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, live birth rate, twin rate, were compared among the three groups.
Results
The embryo implantation rate (53.1%), clinical pregnancy rate (76.9%), ongoing pregnancy rate (67.7%) and live birth rate(66.15%) in the sequential transfer group were significantly higher than those in the other two groups (P < 0.05), and the ectopic pregnancy rate was lower in the sequential transfer group.
Conclusion
Sequential transfer combined with intrauterine perfusion partially improves clinical pregnancy outcomes and reduces the risk of ectopic pregnancy in frozen embryo cycle transfers in patients with recurrent implantation failure, which may be a favourable transfer reference strategy for patients with recurrent implantation failure.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Mitri F, Nayot D, Casper RF, Bentov Y. Current tools for the optimization of embryo transfer technique for recurrent implantation failure. Minerva Ginecol. 2016;68(4):431–49.
2. Cozzolino M. Recurrent implantation failure might be overestimated without PGT-A. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(3):849–50.
3. Esmaeilzadeh S, Mohammadi A, Mahdinejad N, Ghofrani F, Ghasemzadeh-Hasankolaei M. Receptivity markers in endometrial mesenchymal stem cells of recurrent implantation failure and non-recurrent implantation failure women: a pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(8):1393–402.
4. Santamaria X, Simón C. Endometrial factor in unexplained infertility and recurrent implantation failure. Semin Reprod Med. 2021;39(5–06):227–32.
5. Valdes CT, Schutt A, Simon C. Implantation failure of endometrial origin: it is not pathology, but our failure to synchronize the developing embryo with a receptive endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(1):15–8.