Author:
Yusof Amirul Ashraf Bin,Chii Manuela Lee Sze,Yusoff Nur Izzarizlyn Mohammad,Kama Raja Nur Iman Farhani Raja Mazrul,Raj Jairus Reuben,Ghani Nur Azurah Abdul,Ali Anizah,Syn Joyce Hong Soo,Shah Shamsul Azhar,Ishak Nurkhairulnisa Abu,Akinyi Adongo Susan,Zainuddin Ani Amelia
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Turner Syndrome (TS) is a rare sex chromosome abnormality occurring in 1 in 2500 female live births. To date, there is limited data on TS patients in Malaysia. This study aimed to investigate the quality of life (QoL) and body image disturbances among adult population with TS in comparison to age-matched controls in a tertiary hospital in Kuala Lumpur: Hospital Chancellor Tuanku Mukhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (HCTM, UKM).
Methods
This was a cross-sectional study carried out in HCTM, UKM, Kuala Lumpur. TS participants who attended clinic in HCTM, UKM and controls who were hospital staff members were recruited via purposive sampling. TS participants’ sociodemographic and clinical profiles were retrieved from medical records. Two validated, translated questionnaires; World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire and Body Image Disturbances Questionnaires (BIDQ) were completed by participants.
Results
A total of 34 TS patients were approached and 24 (70.5%) of them participated in this study. Their median (IQR) age was 24.0 (7.0) years and their responses were compared to 60 age-matched healthy females as controls [median age (IQR) = 24.0 (8.0) years]. The most common medical problem in TS participants was premature ovarian insufficiency (n = 23; 95.8%). There were no significant differences between TS and control groups’ median scores (overall QOL; 4.00 vs. 4.00, general health; 3.50 vs. 4.00, physical health; 14.86 vs. 15.43, psychological health; 14.67 vs. 14.00 and environment; 15.00 vs. 15.50) of the different WHOQOL-BREF domains. However, TS participants were found to score 13.33 against 16.00, lower than the control group (p < 0.05) in the social relationship domain. Comparatively, body image concerns among TS respondents were significantly higher in impairment in the mainly social areas of functioning (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
The study demonstrated that the overall QoL of TS participants was good and almost similar to that of the controls. However, TS group had significantly lower scores for social domain and had greater concerns in social interactions, thus affecting their social life.
Funder
Program Penyelidikan Prasiswazah Mutiara UKM
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine
Reference25 articles.
1. Cui X, Cui Y, Shi L, Luan J, Zhou X, Han J. A basic understanding of Turner syndrome: Incidence, complications, diagnosis, and treatment. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2018;7(4):223–8.
2. Murtagh J. John Murtagh’s General practice. 6th ed. Australia: McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd; 2015.
3. Kumar V, Abbas A, Aster J. Robbins Basic Pathology. 9th ed. Canada: Elsevier Heal Sci; 2017. p. 133–42.
4. Morris LA, Tishelman AC, Kremen J, Ross RA. Depression in Turner syndrome: a systematic review. Arch Sex Behav. 2020;49(2):769.
5. Wolstencroft J, Skuse D. Social skills and relationships in Turner syndrome. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2018;32(2):85–91.