Association between history of abortion and current use of contraceptives among Mongolian Women

Author:

Phiri Yohane V. A.,Nyam Gunchmaa,Wardani Yuniar,Phiri Doreen,Chuang Kun-Yang,Chao Hsing Jasmine,Nkoka Owen

Abstract

Abstract Background Understanding the factors associated with the adoption of contraceptive methods among women of childbearing age is imperative to improving maternal health outcomes. This study aimed at exploring the association between history of abortion and contraceptive use among Mongolian women. Materials and methods We analyzed cross-sectional data of 8373 women aged 15–49 years from the 2018 Mongolian Social Indicator Sample Survey (MSISS). Binary logistic regression models were used to assess the association between abortion history and current contraceptive use while accounting for both individual- and community- level factors. Results A total of 4347 (51.92%) and 2525 (30.16%) reported current use of various contraceptive methods and a history of abortion in their lifetime, respectively. Women with a history of abortion were less likely to report current use of contraceptives (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.58–0.89]). Specifically, women with a history of abortion were less likely to report use of IUD (AOR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.71–0.90)]) and injectables (AOR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.41–0.84]). History of abortion was associated with increased likelihood of using abstinence (OR = 1.82, 95% CI [1.31–2.53]) as a contraceptive method. Conclusion Our results demonstrated a significant association between history of abortion and contraceptive use. Public health interventions aiming to improve maternal health outcomes through contraceptive use should target women with a history of abortion to improve their uptake.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine

Reference47 articles.

1. U.N. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: Contraceptive Use by Method 2019. 2019.

2. Sitruk-Ware R, Nath A, Mishell DR Jr. Contraception technology: past, present and future. Contraception. 2013;87(3):319–30.

3. Monfemnet and N. Network. On universal access to sexual and reproductive health: Mongolia. 2014.

4. Sedgh G, Hussain R. Unmet need for contraception in developing countries: examining women’s reasons for not using a method. Guttmacher Institute, 2016. p. 2015–2016.

5. Bradley SEK, Casterline JB. Understanding unmet need: history, theory, and measurement. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(2):123–50.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3