Author:
Lubeya Mwansa Ketty,Munakampe Margarate Nzala,Mwila Meek,Makasa Musonda,Mukosha Moses,Jacobs Choolwe,Phiri Christabel Chigwe,Vwalika Bellington,Sichone Victor,Mangala Benedictus,Haketa Melissa Mukalumamba,Kumwenda Andrew,Kaonga Patrick
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite attempts to increase Universal Health Coverage, availability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality-related challenges remain barriers to receiving essential services by women who need them. We aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of women receiving post-abortal care services in Zambia, within a human-rights framework.
Methods
A qualitative case study was conducted between August and September 2021 in Lusaka and Copperbelt provinces of Zambia. Fifteen (15) women seeking post-abortion care services were` interviewed using audio recorders; transcribed data was analyzed using thematic analysis. We report women’s experiences and perceptions of the healthcare system, their experiences of abortion, and healthcare-seeking behaviour. We used the availability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality (AAAQ) framework to understand how women claimed their right to healthcare as they sought and utilized post-abortion care services.
Results
Women who experienced spontaneous abortions delayed seeking health care by viewing symptoms as ‘normal pregnancy symptoms’ and not dangerous. Women also delayed seeking care because they feared the negative attitudes from their communities and the health care providers towards abortion in general, despite it being legal in Zambia. Some services were considered costly, impeding their right to access quality care.
Conclusions
Women delayed seeking care compounded by fear of negative attitudes from the community and healthcare providers. To ensure the provision and utilization of quality all abortion-related healthcare services, there is a need to increase awareness of the availability and legality of safe abortion services, the importance of seeking healthcare early for any abortion-related discomfort, and the provision and availability of free services at all levels of care should be emphasized.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference25 articles.
1. World Health Organisation. Abortion. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion. [cited 2024 Jan 07].
2. World Health Organisation. Why we need to talk about losing a baby. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/why-we-need-to-talk-about-losing-a-baby. [cited 2022 Jan 30].
3. Frederiksen LE, Ernst A, Brix N, Lauridsen LLB, Roos L, Ramlau-Hansen CH, et al. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes at advanced maternal age. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(3):457–63.
4. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Moller A-B, Tunçalp Ö, Beavin C, et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(9):e1152–2116.
5. Coast E, Murray SF. “These things are dangerous”: understanding induced abortion trajectories in urban Zambia. Soc Sci Med. 2016;153:201–9. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953616300806. [cited 2022 Jan 30].