Abstract
AbstractLava flows can cause substantial and immediate damage to the built environment and affect the economy and society over days through to decades. Lava flow modelling can be undertaken to help stakeholders prepare for and respond to lava flow crises. Traditionally, lava flow modelling is conducted on a digital elevation model, but this type of representation of the surface may not be appropriate for all settings. Indeed, we suggest that in urban areas a digital surface model may more accurately capture all of the obstacles a lava flow would encounter. We use three effusive eruption scenarios in the well-studied Auckland Volcanic Field (New Zealand) to demonstrate the difference between modelling on an elevation model versus on a surface model. The influence of surficial features on lava flow modelling results is quantified using a modified Jaccard coefficient. For the scenario in the most urbanised environment, the Jaccard coefficient is 40%, indicating less than half of the footprints overlap, while for the scenario in the least urbanised environment, the Jaccard coefficient is 90%, indicating substantial overlap. We find that manmade surficial features can influence the hazard posed by lava flows and that a digital surface model may be more applicable in highly modified environments.
Funder
DEVORA
New Zealand Earthquake Commission
GNS Science Strategic Investment Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Safety Research,Geophysics
Reference61 articles.
1. Allen SR, Smith IEM (1994) Eruption styles and volcanic hazard in the Auckland volcanic field, New Zealand. Geosci Reports Shizuoka Uni 20:5–14
2. Axelsson P (1999) Processing of laser scanner data- algorithms and applications. J Photogrammetry Remote Sens 54:138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00008-8
3. Barca D, Crisci GM, Di Gregorio S, Nicoletta F (1993) Cellular automata methods for modelling lava flows: simulation of the 1986-1987 eruption, Mount Etna, Sicily. In: Kilburn CRJ, Luongo G (eds) Active lavas: monitoring and Modelling. Routledge, New York
4. Bebbington MS (2015) Spatio-volumetric hazard estimation in the Auckland volcanic field. Bull Volcanol 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-015-0921-3
5. Bebbington MS, Cronin SJ (2011) Spatio-temporal hazard estimation in the Auckland volcanic field, New Zealand, with a new event-order model. Bull Volcanol 73:55–72
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献