Abstract
Abstract
Background
Several countries across Europe are engaging in burden of disease (BoD) studies. This article aims to understand the experiences of eight small European states in relation to their research opportunities and challenges in conducting national BoD studies and in knowledge translation of research outputs to policy-making.
Methods
Countries participating in the study were those outlined by the WHO/Europe Small Countries Initiative and members of the Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action CA18218 European Burden of Disease Network. A set of key questions targeting the research landscape were distributed to these members. WHO’s framework approach for research development capacities was applied to gain a comprehensive understanding of shortages in relation to national BoD studies in order to help strengthen health research capacities in the small states of Europe.
Results
Most small states lack the resources and expertise to conduct BoD studies, but nationally representative data are relatively accessible. Public health officials and researchers tend to have a close-knit relationship with the governing body and policy-makers. The major challenge faced by small states is in knowledge generation and transfer rather than knowledge translation. Nevertheless, some policy-makers fail to make adequate use of knowledge translation.
Conclusions
Small states, if equipped with adequate resources, may have the capacity to conduct national BoD studies. This work can serve as a model for identifying current gaps and opportunities in each of the eight small European countries, as well as a guide for translating country BoD study results into health policy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Murray CJL, Lozez AD. The Global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020: summary. 1996.
2. Murray CJL, Frenk J, Piot P, Mundel T. GBD 2.0: a continuously updated global resource. The Lancet. 2013;382:9–11.
3. Yoon S-J, Kim Y-E, Kim E-J. Why they are different: based on the burden of disease research of WHO and Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7236194. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7236194.
4. Wyper GMA, Grant I, Fletcher E, Chalmers N, McCartney G, Stockton DL. Prioritising the development of severity distributions in burden of disease studies for countries in the European region. Arch Public Health. 2020;78:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-019-0385-6.
5. Charalampous P, Pallari E, Tyrovolas S, Middleton N, Economou M, Devleesschauwer B, et al. Burden of non-communicable diseases in Cyprus, 1990–2017: findings from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study. Arch Public Health. 2021;79:138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00655-8.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献