Author:
Smits Pernelle,Champagne François
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Health research has scientific, social and political impacts. To achieve such impacts, several institutions need to participate; however, health research funding institutions are seldom nominated in the literature as essential players. The attention they have received has so far focused mainly on their role in knowledge translation, informing policy-making and the need to organise health research systems. In this article, we will focus solely on the governance of national health research funding institutions. Our objectives are to identify the main functions of governance for such institutions and actionable governance functions. This research should be useful in several ways, including in highlighting, tracking and measuring the governance trends in a given funding institution, and to forestall low-level governance.
Methods
First, we reviewed existing frameworks in the grey literature, selecting seven relevant documents. Second, we developed an integrated framework for health research funding institution governance and management.
Third, we extracted actionable information for governance by selecting a mix of North American, European and Asian institutions that had documentation available in English (e.g. annual report, legal status, strategy).
Results
The framework contains 13 functions – 5 dedicated to governance (intelligence acquisition, resourcing and instrumentation, relationships management, accountability and performance, and strategy formulation), 3 dedicated to management (priority-setting, financing and knowledge transfer), and 5 dedicated to transversal logics that apply to both governance and management (ethics, transparency, capacity reinforcement, monitoring and evaluation, and public engagement).
Conclusions
Herein, we provide a conceptual contribution for scholars in the field of governance and health research as well as a practical contribution, with actionable functions for high-level managers in charge of the governance of health research funding institutions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Nederhof AJ. Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review. Scientometrics. 2006;66(1):81–100.
2. Reale E, Avramov D, Canhial K, Donovan C, Flecha R, Holm P, et al. A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research. Res Eval. 2018;27:298–308.
3. Panel on Return on Investment in Health Research. Making an Impact: A Preferred Framework and Indicators to Measure Returns on Investment in Health Research. Ottawa: Canadian Academy of Health Sciences; 2009. p. 136.
4. Neubauer C. Gouvernance de la recherche – Régulation, organisation et financement 2012. https://sciencescitoyennes.org/gouvernance-de-la-recherche-regulation-organisation-et-financement/. Accessed 1 June 2019.
5. Staley K, Buckland SA, Hayes H, Tarpey M. ‘The missing links’: understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research. Health Expect. 2014;17:755–64.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献