Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused major disruptions to the US Military Health System (MHS). In this study, we evaluated the MHS response to the pandemic to understand the impact of the pandemic response in a large, national, integrated healthcare system providing care for ~ 9 million beneficiaries.
Methods
We performed a narrative literature review of 16 internal Department of Defense (DoD) reports, including reviews mandated by the US Congress in response to the pandemic. We categorized the findings using the Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) framework developed by the DoD to assess system efficiency and effectiveness.
Results
The majority of the findings were in the policy, organization, and personnel categories. Key findings showed that the MHS structure to address surge situations was beneficial during the pandemic response, and the rapid growth of telehealth created the potential impact for improved access to routine and specialized care. However, organizational transition contributed to miscommunication and uneven implementation of policies; disruptions affected clinical training, upskilling, and the supply chain; and staffing shortages contributed to burnout among healthcare workers.
Conclusion
Given its highly integrated, vertical structure, the MHS was in a better position than many civilian healthcare networks to respond efficiently to the pandemic. However, similar to the US civilian sector, the MHS also experienced delays in care, staffing and materiel challenges, and a rapid switch to telehealth. Lessons regarding the importance of communication and preparation for future public health emergency responses are relevant to civilian healthcare systems responding to COVID-19 and other similar public health crises.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Tanielian T, Farmer C. The US military health system: promoting readiness and providing care. Health Aff. 2019;38(8):1259–67. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00239.
2. Adirim T. A military health system for the twenty-first century. Health Aff. 2019;38(8):1268–73. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00302.
3. 116th Congress. H.R. 6395—William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. 2021 Jan 1 [cited 2022 Dec 22]. 1482 p. Available from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6395.
4. United States Department of Defense. Report to Congressional Defense Committees: COVID-19 military health system review panel. Washington, DC: Department of Defense; 2023 Mar. 21 p. Available from: https://www.health.mil/Reference-Center/Reports/2023/03/10/COVID-19-Military-Health-System-Review-Panel.
5. Paré G, Trudel M-C, Jaana M, Kitsiou S. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Inf Manag. 2015;52:183–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献