Author:
Williamson Anne,de León Lorena Ponce,Garza Francisco Rodríguez,Macías Valeria,Flores Navarro Hugo
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In rural settings where patients face significant structural barriers to accessing healthcare services, the formal existence of government-provided health coverage does not necessarily translate to meaningful care delivery. This paper analyses the effectiveness of an innovative approach to overcome these barriers, the Right to Health Care programme offered by Compañeros en Salud in Chiapas, Mexico. This programme provides comprehensive free coverage of all additional direct and indirect medical costs as well as accompaniment through the medical system. Over 550 patients had participated from 2013 until November 2018.
Methods
Focusing on ten of the most frequently treated conditions, including hernias, cataracts and congenital heart defects, we performed a retrospective case study analysis of the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from treatment and the cost per QALY for 69 patients. This analysis used disability weights and uncertainty intervals from the Global Burden of Disease study and organisational micro-costing data for each patient. Each patient was compared to their own hypothetical counterfactual health outcome had they not received the secondary and tertiary care required for the specific condition. A mixed methods approach is used to establish this counterfactual baseline, drawing on pre-intervention observations, qualitative interviews and established literature precedent.
Results
The programme was found to deliver an average of 14.4 additional QALYs (95% uncertainty interval 12.4–15.8) without time discounting. The mean cost per QALY over these conditions was $388 USD (95% UI $262–588) at purchasing power parity.
Conclusions
These numbers compare favourably with studies of other health services and international cost per QALY guidelines. They reflect the on-treatment effect for the ten conditions analysed and are presented as a case study indicative of the promise of healthcare intermediaries rather than a definitive assessment of cost-effectiveness. Nonetheless, these results show the potential feasibility and cost effectiveness of a more comprehensive approach to healthcare provision in a resource-limited rural setting.
Trial registration
This study involves economic analysis of a programme facilitating access to public healthcare services. Thus, there was no associated clinical trial to be registered.
Funder
Balliol College, University of Oxford
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Ensor T, Cooper S. Overcoming Barriers to Health Service Access and Influencing the Demand Side Through Purchasing. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2004.
2. OECD. OECD Review of Health Systems: Mexico 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2016.
3. CONEVAL, Medición de la Pobreza: Resumen Ejecutivo. 2013. https://www.coneval.org.mx/Informes/Coordinacion/Pobreza_2012/RESUMEN_EJECUTIVO_MEDICION_POBREZA_2012_Parte1.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2020.
4. NHS. Healthcare Travel Costs Scheme (HTCS). 2017. https://www.nhs.uk/using-the-nhs/help-with-health-costs/healthcare-travel-costs-scheme-htcs/. Accessed 12 Mar 2020.
5. Chaiyachati KH, Moore K, Adelberg M. Too early to cut transportation benefits from medicaid enrollees. Health Services Insights. 2018;12:1178632918804817.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献