Strengthening research ethics governance and regulatory oversight in Central America and the Dominican Republic in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study

Author:

Canario Guzmán Julio ArturoORCID,Orlich Jessie,Mendizábal-Cabrera Renata,Ying Argentina,Vergès Claude,Espinoza Eleonora,Soriano Mario,Cárcamo Elsy,Beltrán Briana,Mendoza Marrero Eddys Rafael,Sepulveda Reyna,Nieto Anderson Claudia,Feune de Colombi Nicole,Lescano Roxana,Pérez-Then Eddy,Lang Trudie,Alger Jackeline

Abstract

Abstract Background Good governance and regulatory supervision are required to conduct research in an international public health emergency context and to ensure compliance with ethical standards. The “Strengthening research ethics governance and regulatory oversight in Central America and the Dominican Republic in response to the COVID-19 pandemic” study is a regional effort in which research ethics stakeholders participated in addressing research ethics governance and preparedness response challenges to the COVID-19 pandemic in Central America and the Dominican Republic. Methods A qualitative action research study was conducted following a participatory approach. Research ethics stakeholders in Central America and the Dominican Republic were mapped; a regional webinar and three virtual workshops were conducted discussing research ethics governance, ethics review and collaborative research practice during the pandemic. A roundtable session presented results and obtained feedback on a draft of a policy to strengthen regional research ethics governance. Results Countries across Central America and the Dominican Republic are at different stages in their development of research ethics systems. Countries with more established systems before COVID-19 were better organized and prepared to respond. This finding argues against improvisation and supports further work on strengthening governance of research ethics systems. Community engagement in research ethics public policy-making is practically absent in the region. Research and research ethics collaboration schemes are lacking amongst the countries; however, there are incipient initiatives in the region, such as the Central America and Caribbean Network of Research Ethics Committees. A policy brief with recommendations on how to advance towards strengthening the governance of research ethics systems was prepared and submitted to the Central American Integration System for analysis and possible approval. Conclusion National research ethics systems in Central America and the Dominican Republic were unprepared to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic with respect to research oversight and effective collaboration. In most cases, national research ethics systems were found to be weak, and regional research collaboration was practically absent. To promote collaboration, a joint strategy needs to be developed with a regional vision towards sharing knowledge and best practices.

Funder

World Health Organization

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference34 articles.

1. World Health Organization. A coordinated global research roadmap. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/a-coordinated-global-research-roadmap. Accessed 22 Oct 2022.

2. Calia C, Reid C, Guerra C, Oshodi A-G, Marley C, Amos A, et al. Ethical challenges in the COVID-19 research context: a toolkit for supporting analysis and resolution. Ethics Behav. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1800469.

3. Hyder AA, Dawson L, Bachani AM, Lavery JV. Moving from research ethics review to research ethics systems in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2009;373(9666):862–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60488-8.

4. World Health Organization. Stewardship/governance of health systems in the WHO European Region. Regional Committee for Europe, Fifty-eighth session, Tbilisi, Georgia, 15–18 September 2008. EUR/RC58/9, +EUR/RC58/Conf.Doc./4, 28 July 2008, 80808. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/70180/RC58_edoc09.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2020.

5. Pang T, Sadana R, Hanney S, Bhutta ZA, Hyder AA, Simon J. Knowledge for better health: a conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(11):815–20.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3