Development of the Arabic Health Measures database: a bibliometric analysis of Arabic health-related measures

Author:

Albawardi Nada M.,Shaikh Quratulain,Alahaideb WejdanORCID,Alamasi MaryamORCID,Aljasser DoaaORCID,Alrasheed LamaORCID,Alsulaiman Sultanah H.ORCID,Alghannam Abdullah F.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background To develop an open-access database of Arabic health measures intended for use by researchers and healthcare providers, along with a bibliometric analysis of the measures included in the database. Methods A search was conducted up to 31 December 2021 in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, SAGE, Springer and Elsevier for published articles or abstracts with keywords “Arabic” AND “translation”, “adaptation” OR “validation”. Information on the measure and the methodology used in the study was then entered into a database. An open-access platform was developed to allow users to search for measures according to their needs. A bibliometric analysis of the articles and measures was then conducted. Results A total of 894 publications met the inclusion criteria. The articles discussed 716 measures that were developed using participants from at least 38 countries. The number of measures for adults was five times that for children. Mental health was the most frequent construct assessed (11.5%), followed by “function/disability” measures (10.6%). The majority of measures (54%) required 5 minutes or less to complete. Approximately 17% of the tools were available directly from the article. Saudi Arabia and Lebanon had the greatest number of publications, with 217 (23%) and 114 (12%), respectively. The majority of the publications included reporting of the validation and reliability of the instruments (64% and 56%, respectively). Conclusions There is a paucity of research on the quantity and quality of Arabic health measures. Similar to previous reviews, we found the number of publications on Arabic measures to be limited in comparison to those in English; however, it is encouraging that the number of publications appears to have increased steadily over the past decade. While we found the majority of publications reported on psychometric testing, we are unable to comment on the quality of the methodology used, and further investigation into this area is recommended. As the Arabic Health Measures database will facilitate the search for health instruments that have published data on their development, this will increase their visibility and use in research and clinical settings.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference19 articles.

1. Roberts WD, Stone PW. How to choose and evaluate a research instrument. Appl Nurs Res. 2003;16(1):70–2.

2. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–32.

3. Behling O, Law KS. Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: problems and solutions, vol. 133. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000.

4. Harkness JA, van de Vijver FJ, Mohler PP, Wiley J. Cross-cultural survey methods, vol. 325. NJ: Wiley-Interscience Hoboken; 2003.

5. Pan Y, de La Puente M. Census Bureau guideline for the translation of data collection instruments and supporting materials: documentation on how the guideline was developed. Survey Methodol. 2005;6. https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2005/adrm/rsm2005-06.html.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3