Barriers and enablers to source plasma donation by gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men under revised eligibility criteria: protocol for a multiple stakeholder feasibility study

Author:

Vesnaver ElisabethORCID,Goldman Mindy,O’Brien Sheila,MacPherson Paul,Butler-Foster Terrie,Lapierre Don,Otis Joanne,Devine Dana V.,Germain Marc,Rosser Andrew,MacDonagh Richard,Randall Taylor,Osbourne-Sorrell William,Clement-Thorne Broderic,Al-Bakri Taim Bilal,Rubini Kyle A.,Hill Nolan E.,Presseau Justin

Abstract

Abstract Background Blood donation policy in Canada for gay, bisexual and other men who have had sex with men (gbMSM) has changed progressively in the last decade from indefinite deferral to 3-month deferral from last male-to-male sex. Driven by safety data and overseen by the national regulator, more inclusive policies continue to redress the disparity in donation for gbMSM. At the same time, the need for source plasma to prepare fractionated blood products is growing worldwide. The collection and processing of source plasma ensures greater safety compared to whole blood donation with respect to transfusion-transmitted infection. This greater safety offers an opportunity to evolve policies for gbMSM from time-based to behaviour-based deferral using revised eligibility criteria. However, changing policies does not in itself necessarily guarantee that gbMSM will donate or that staff in donor clinics are ready to support them to do so. In anticipation of a move to behaviour-based donation screening for gbMSM in Canada, we aim to assess the acceptability of and perceived barriers and enablers to source plasma donation using revised screening criteria for gbMSM among key stakeholders to inform policy implementation strategies. Methods This mixed-methods feasibility study will involve gbMSM and donor centre staff to understand modifiable barriers to implementing more inclusive eligibility criteria. Key informant interviews and surveys will be rooted in the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify modifiable factors associated with source plasma donation motives in gbMSM and training needs in donation centre staff. We will use an integrated knowledge translation approach involving a partnership between researchers, the national blood operator and gbMSM, situating knowledge users as key research team members to ensure their perspectives inform all aspects of the research. Discussion Our integrated knowledge translation approach will provide a more comprehensive and collaborative understanding of blood operator and gbMSM needs while accelerating the implementation of study findings. Given the historical backdrop of the decades of exclusion of sexually active gbMSM from blood donation, this study has the potential not only to inform a process and policy for gbMSM to donate source plasma, a blood product, but also offers opportunities for new relationships between these knowledge users.

Funder

Canadian Blood Services

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference56 articles.

1. Goldman M, Lapierre D, Lemay L, Devine D, Sher G. Donor criteria for men who have sex with men: a Canadian perspective. Transfusion. 2014;54:1887–92.

2. Health Canada. Statement from the Minister of Health on further reducing barriers for blood donation by men who have sex with men. gcnws. 2019. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/news/2019/05/statement-from-the-minister-of-health-on-further-reducing-barriers-for-blood-donation-by-men-who-have-sex-with-men.html . Accessed 10 Apr 2020.

3. Goldman M, Shih AW-Y, Orien SF, Devine D. Donor deferral policies for men who have sex with men: past, present and future. Vox Sang. 2018;113(2):95–103.

4. Offergeld R, Kamp C, Heiden M, Norda R, Behr-Gross M-E. Sexual risk behaviour and donor deferral in Europe. Vox Sang. 2014;107(4):420–7.

5. Suligoi B, Pupella S, Regine V, Raimondo M, Velati C, Grazzini G. Changing blood donor screening criteria from permanent deferral for men who have sex with men to individual sexual risk assessment: no evidence of a significant impact on the human immunodeficiency virus epidemic in Italy. Blood Transfus Trasfus Sangue. 2013;11(3):441–8.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3