Abstract
AbstractBackgroundHealth warning labels (HWLs) represent an evidence-based tobacco control strategy; however, their application to heated tobacco products (HTPs) and related impacts are understudied. This study examined the impact of HTP HWLs on HTP use intentions and risk perceptions among current tobacco users.MethodsWe analyzed cross-sectional survey data from adults in the US and Israel reporting past-month tobacco use and awareness of HTPs (N = 424). Multivariate analyses examined: (1) sociodemographics in relation to self-reported impact of HTP HWLs (i.e., more concerned about HTP use, reassured, no effect [referent]) among those who noticed HTP HWLs (multinomial regressions); and (2) HWL impacts in relation to HTP use intentions and perceived addictiveness and harm (linear regressions).ResultsAmong participants who noticed HTP HWLs (n = 372, 87.7%), 27.7% reported HWLs increased their concerns about HTP use, 22.6% were reassured about use, and 49.7% reported no effect. Factors associated with increased concern (vs. no effect) included other tobacco product use (aOR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.21–3.64) and being female (aOR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.03–3.05). Factors associated with being reassured about HTPs use (vs. no effect) included current HTP use (aOR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.11–4.00) and being from Israel (vs. US: aOR = 3.85, 95% CI 1.85–7.69), female (aOR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.07–3.42), and less educated (< college education: aOR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.42–4.63). Reporting that HWLs on HTPs increased concern (β = 0.46, 95% CI 0.03–0.89) and reassured of use (β = 0.94, 95% CI 0.47–1.41) were positively associated with HTP use intentions; no associations with risk perceptions were found.ConclusionsFindings indicate that most tobacco users noticed HWLs on HTPs, but the majority reported no effect or being reassured of using HTPs, effects that were magnified for specific subgroups. Both increased concern and reassurance correlated with greater use intentions. Additional research should evaluate HTP HWL impacts and ensure effectiveness in communicating risks and discouraging use.
Funder
National Cancer Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference51 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Tobacco Free Initiative (TFI): heat-not-burn tobacco products information sheet. 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HEP-HPR-2020.2.
2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public health consequences of e-cigarettes. 2018. Report No.: 0309468345.
3. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Heated tobacco products definition and global market 2020. https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/assets/global/pdfs/en/HTP_definition_en.pdf.
4. Gale N, McEwan M, Camacho OM, Hardie G, Murphy J, Proctor CJ. Changes in biomarkers of exposure on switching from a conventional cigarette to the glo tobacco heating product: a randomized, controlled ambulatory study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021;23(3):584–91.
5. Leigh NJ, Palumbo MN, Marino AM, O’Connor RJ, Goniewicz ML. Tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA) in heated tobacco product IQOS. Tob Control. 2018;27(Suppl 1):s37–8.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献