Acute respiratory failure in immunocompromised patients: outcome and clinical features according to neutropenia status
-
Published:2020-10-22
Issue:1
Volume:10
Page:
-
ISSN:2110-5820
-
Container-title:Annals of Intensive Care
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann. Intensive Care
Author:
Mokart DjamelORCID, Darmon Michael, Schellongowski Peter, Pickkers Peter, Soares Marcio, Rello Jordi, Bauer Philippe R., van de Louw Andry, Lemiale Virginie, Taccone Fabio Silvio, Martin-Loeches Ignacio, Salluh Jorge, Rusinova Katerina, Mehta Sangeeta, Antonelli Massimo, Kouatchet Achille, Barratt-Due Andreas, Valkonen Miia, Landburg Precious Pearl, Bukan Ramin Brandt, Pène Frédéric, Metaxa Victoria, Burghi Gaston, Saillard Colombe, Nielsen Lene B., Canet Emmanuel, Bisbal Magali, Azoulay Elie,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The impact of neutropenia in critically ill immunocompromised patients admitted in a context of acute respiratory failure (ARF) remains uncertain. The primary objective was to assess the prognostic impact of neutropenia on outcomes of these patients. Secondary objective was to assess etiology of ARF according to neutropenia.
Methods
We performed a post hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter multinational study from 23 ICUs belonging to the Nine-I network. Between November 2015 and July 2016, all adult immunocompromised patients with ARF admitted to the ICU were included in the study. Adjusted analyses included: (1) a hierarchical model with center as random effect; (2) propensity score (PS) matched cohort; and (3) adjusted analysis in the matched cohort.
Results
Overall, 1481 patients were included in this study of which 165 had neutropenia at ICU admission (11%). ARF etiologies distribution was significantly different between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients, main etiologies being bacterial pneumonia (48% vs 27% in neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients, respectively). Initial oxygenation strategy was standard supplemental oxygen in 755 patients (51%), high-flow nasal oxygen in 165 (11%), non-invasive ventilation in 202 (14%) and invasive mechanical ventilation in 359 (24%). Before adjustment, hospital mortality was significantly higher in neutropenic patients (54% vs 42%; p = 0.006). After adjustment for confounder and center effect, neutropenia was no longer associated with outcome (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.93–2.11). Similar results were observed after matching (52% vs 46%, respectively; p = 0.35) and after adjustment in the matched cohort (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.63–1.72).
Conclusion
Neutropenia at ICU admission is not associated with hospital mortality in this cohort of critically ill immunocompromised patients admitted for ARF. In neutropenic patients, main ARF etiologies are bacterial and fungal infections.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Reference31 articles.
1. Brenner H. Long-term survival rates of cancer patients achieved by the end of the 20th century: a period analysis. Lancet. 2002;360(9340):1131–5. 2. van Vilet M, van der Burgt MP, van der Velden WJ, van der Hoeven JG, de Haan AF, Donnelly JP, et al. Trends in the outcomes of Dutch haematological patients receiving intensive care support. Neth J Med. 2014;72(2):107–12. 3. Verdecchia A, Francisci S, Brenner H, Gatta G, Micheli A, Mangone L, et al. Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000–02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 data. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(9):784–96. 4. Darmon M, Bourmaud A, Georges Q, Soares M, Jeon K, Oeyen S, et al. Changes in critically ill cancer patients’ short-term outcome over the last decades: results of systematic review with meta-analysis on individual data. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(7):977–87. 5. Darmon M, Azoulay E, Alberti C, Fieux F, Moreau D, Le Gall JR, et al. Impact of neutropenia duration on short-term mortality in neutropenic critically ill cancer patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(12):1775–80.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|