Perceived inequity, professional and personal fulfillment by women intensivists in France

Author:

Hauw-Berlemont Caroline, ,Aubron Cécile,Aissaoui Nadia,Bodet-Contentin Laetitia,Boissier Florence,Fartoukh Muriel Sarah,Jourdain Mercedes,Le Marec Julien,Pestel Julia,Salmon Gandonnière Charlotte,Tamion Fabienne,Hamzaoui Olfa

Abstract

Abstract Background The medical workforce has been feminized for the last two decades worldwide. Nonetheless, women remain under-represented among intensivists. We conducted a survey among French women intensivists to assess their professional and personal quality of life and their perception of potential gender discrimination at work. Methods We conducted an observational descriptive study by sending a survey, designed by the group FEMMIR (FEmmes Médecins en Médecine Intensive Réanimation), to women intensivists in France, using primarily the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF) mailing list. The questionnaire was also available online between September 2019 and January 2020 and women intensivists were encouraged to answer through email reminders. It pertained to five main domains, including demographic characteristics, work position, workload and clinical/research activities, self-fulfillment scale, perceived discrimination at work and suggested measures to implement. Results Three hundred and seventy-one women responded to the questionnaire, among whom 16% had an academic position. Being a woman intensivist and pregnancy were both considered to increase difficulties in careers’ advancement by 31% and 73% of the respondents, respectively. Almost half of the respondents (46%) quoted their quality of life equal to or lower than 6 on a scale varying from 1 (very bad quality of life) to 10 (excellent quality of life). They were 52% to feel an imbalance between their personal and professional life at the cost of their personal life. Gender discrimination has been experienced by 55% of the respondents while 37% confided having already been subject of bullying or harassment. Opportunities to adjust their work timetable including part-time work, better considerations for pregnant women including increasing the number of intensivists and the systematic replacement during maternity leave, and the respect of the law regarding the paternity leave were suggested as key measures to enable better professional and personal accomplishment by women intensivists. Conclusion In this first large French survey in women intensivists, we pointed out issues felt by women intensivists that included an imbalance between professional and personal life, a perceived loss of opportunity due to the fact of being a woman, frequent reported bullying or harassment and a lack of consideration of the needs related to pregnancy and motherhood.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Conseil de l’Ordre National des Médecins: Atlas de la Démographie médicale en France, Situation au 1er Janvier 2018. Retrieved from https://www.conseil-national.medecin.fr/lordre-medecins/conseil-national-lordre/demographie-medicale#sommaire-id-0 / https://www.conseil-national.medecin.fr/sites/default/files/external-package/analyse_etude/hb1htw/cnom_atlas_2018_0.pdf.

2. Enquête RPPS, Synthèse des effectifs au 1er Janvier 2015. Retrieved from https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/rpps_medecins_-_synthese_des_effectifs_au_1er_jan2015.pdf.

3. Venkatesh B, Mehta S, Angus DC, Finfer S, Machado FV, Marshall J, Mitchell I, Peake S, Zimmerman JL. Women in Intensive Care study: a preliminary assessment of international data on female representation in the ICU physician workforce, leadership and academic positions. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):211.

4. Enquête APH: Equilibre Vie privée/ Vie professionnelle pour les praticiens à l’hôpital public. Retrieved from https://aph-france.fr/Premiers-resultats-de-l-enquete-Vie-privee-Vie-professionelle-pour-les.html / http://www.avenir-hospitalier.fr/images/Resume_Enquete_APH-JM_Vie_Privee_Vie_Professionnelle.pdf.

5. Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(3):261–6.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3