Abstract
Abstract
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of intensive care units (ICUs) and their organization in healthcare systems. However, ICU capacity and availability are ongoing concerns beyond the pandemic, particularly due to an aging population and increasing complexity of care. This study aimed to assess the current and future shortage of ICU physicians in France, ten years after a previous evaluation. A national e-survey was conducted among French ICUs in January 2022 to collect data on ICU characteristics, medical staffing, individual physician characteristics, and education and training capacities.
Results
Among 290 ICUs contacted, 242 responded (response rate: 83%), representing 4943 ICU beds. The survey revealed an overall of 300 full time equivalent (FTE) ICU physician vacancies in the country. Nearly two-thirds of the participating ICUs reported at least one physician vacancy and 35% relied on traveling physicians to cover shifts. The ICUs most affected by physician vacancies were the ICUs of non-university affiliated public hospitals. The retirements expected in the next five years represented around 10% of the workforce. The median number of physicians per ICU was 7.0, corresponding to a ratio of 0.36 physician (FTE) per ICU bed. In addition, 27% of ICUs were at risk of critical dysfunction or closure due to vacancies and impending retirements.
Conclusion
The findings highlight the urgent need to address the shortage of ICU physicians in France. Compared to a similar study conducted in 2012, the inadequacy between ICU physician supply and demand has increased, resulting in a higher number of vacancies. Our study suggests that, among others, increasing the number of ICM residents trained each year could be a crucial step in addressing this issue. Failure to take appropriate measures may lead to further closures of ICUs and increased risks to patients in this healthcare system.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Annane D, Federici L, Chagnon JL, Diehl JL, Dreyfuss D, Guiot P, Trade Union of Intensive Care Physicians, et al. Intensive care units, the Achilles heel of France in the COVID-19 battle. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;2:100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100046.
2. Marshall JC, Bosco L, Adhikari NK, Connolly B, Diaz JV, Dorman T, et al. What is an intensive care unit? A report of the task force of the world federation of societies of intensive and critical care medicine. J Crit Care. 2017;37:270–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.07.015.
3. Flabouris A, Hart GK, George C. Outcomes of patients admitted to tertiary intensive care units after interhospital transfer: comparison with patients admitted from emergency departments. Crit Care Resusc. 2008;10(2):97–105.
4. Amin P, Fox-Robichaud A, Divatia JV, Pelosi P, Altintas D, Eryüksel E, Council of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine, et al. The Intensive care unit specialist: report from the task force of world federation of societies of intensive and critical care medicine. J Crit Care. 2016;35:223–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.001.
5. Blunt MC, Burchett KR. Out-of-hours consultant cover and case-mix-adjusted mortality in intensive care. Lancet. 2000;356:735–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02634-9.