Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock
-
Published:2021-01-29
Issue:1
Volume:11
Page:
-
ISSN:2110-5820
-
Container-title:Annals of Intensive Care
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann. Intensive Care
Author:
Scheeren Thomas W. L.ORCID, Bakker Jan, Kaufmann Thomas, Annane Djillali, Asfar Pierre, Boerma E. Christiaan, Cecconi Maurizio, Chew Michelle S., Cholley Bernard, Cronhjort Maria, De Backer Daniel, Dubin Arnaldo, Dünser Martin W., Duranteau Jacques, Gordon Anthony C., Hajjar Ludhmila A., Hamzaoui Olfa, Hernandez Glenn, Kanoore Edul Vanina, Koster Geert, Landoni Giovanni, Leone Marc, Levy Bruno, Martin Claude, Mebazaa Alexandre, Monnet Xavier, Morelli Andrea, Payen Didier, Pearse Rupert M., Pinsky Michael R., Radermacher Peter, Reuter Daniel A., Sakr Yasser, Sander Michael, Saugel Bernd, Singer Mervyn, Squara Pierre, Vieillard-Baron Antoine, Vignon Philippe, Vincent Jean-Louis, van der Horst Iwan C. C.ORCID, Vistisen Simon T., Teboul Jean-Louis
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Treatment decisions on critically ill patients with circulatory shock lack consensus. In an international survey, we aimed to evaluate the indications, current practice, and therapeutic goals of inotrope therapy in the treatment of patients with circulatory shock.
Methods
From November 2016 to April 2017, an anonymous web-based survey on the use of cardiovascular drugs was accessible to members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). A total of 14 questions focused on the profile of respondents, the triggering factors, first-line choice, dosing, timing, targets, additional treatment strategy, and suggested effect of inotropes. In addition, a group of 42 international ESICM experts was asked to formulate recommendations for the use of inotropes based on 11 questions.
Results
A total of 839 physicians from 82 countries responded. Dobutamine was the first-line inotrope in critically ill patients with acute heart failure for 84% of respondents. Two-thirds of respondents (66%) stated to use inotropes when there were persistent clinical signs of hypoperfusion or persistent hyperlactatemia despite a supposed adequate use of fluids and vasopressors, with (44%) or without (22%) the context of low left ventricular ejection fraction. Nearly half (44%) of respondents stated an adequate cardiac output as target for inotropic treatment. The experts agreed on 11 strong recommendations, all of which were based on excellent (> 90%) or good (81–90%) agreement. Recommendations include the indications for inotropes (septic and cardiogenic shock), the choice of drugs (dobutamine, not dopamine), the triggers (low cardiac output and clinical signs of hypoperfusion) and targets (adequate cardiac output) and stopping criteria (adverse effects and clinical improvement).
Conclusion
Inotrope use in critically ill patients is quite heterogeneous as self-reported by individual caregivers. Eleven strong recommendations on the indications, choice, triggers and targets for the use of inotropes are given by international experts. Future studies should focus on consistent indications for inotrope use and implementation into a guideline for circulatory shock that encompasses individualized targets and outcomes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Reference46 articles.
1. Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Vincent JL, Sprung CL, Moreno R, Ranieri VM, et al. Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(3):589–97. 2. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(12):1795–815. 3. Weil MH. Personal commentary on the diagnosis and treatment of circulatory shock states. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004;10(4):246–9. 4. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):779–89. 5. Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1726–34.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|