Abstract
Abstract
Background
In Japan, home hemodialysis (HHD) has several benefits, including a favorable prognosis, enhanced quality of life (QOL) of patients, and cost-effectiveness. However, the caregiver’s burden in assisting patients on HHD is significant, which influences their decision to continue HHD. This study focused on the relationship between medical and nursing interventions, caregiver resolve to continue HHD, and caregiver quality of life, aiming to create support strategies for caregivers.
Methods
A multicenter cross-sectional survey was conducted on caregivers of patients on HHD from 150 HHD facilities in Japan. The caregiver’s intent to continue HHD was assessed using a four-tier response scale that evaluated aspects such as caregiver–healthcare provider meetings, caregiver breaks, treatment discussions, difficulty in HHD initiation, and post-initiation medical support. Caregiver QOL was evaluated using the Short-form Health Survey, eight domains (SF-8). Statistical analysis involved χ-squared tests, independent t-tests, and propensity score matching.
Results
The study achieved a caregiver participation rate of 55.6%. Results indicated that caregivers who were inclined to continue HHD were significantly more likely to receive respite outpatient dialysis and had a better understanding of HHD mechanics as explained by healthcare professionals; however, propensity score matching revealed limited generalizability. There was no significant difference in the SF-8 scores before and after propensity score matching among the groups.
Conclusions
This study highlights that there are a small number of caregivers who have little motivation to continue HHD and emphasizes the crucial role of support from healthcare professionals. Comprehensive support, including respite dialysis and detailed HHD information, may affect HHD sustainability.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference19 articles.
1. Hanafusa N, Abe M, Tsuneki N, Goto S, Abe M, Nakai S. Current status of chronic dialysis therapy in Japan (as of December 31, 2021). J Dial. 2022;55(12):665–723.
2. Hanafusa N. Patient prognosis (life, hospitalization, QOL, etc). Kidney Dial. 2016;81(5):796–801.
3. Watanabe Y, Ohno Y, Inoue T, Takane H, Okada H, Suzuki H. Home hemodialysis and conventional in-center hemodialysis in Japan: a comparison of health-related quality of Life. Hemodial Int. 2014;18:S32–8.
4. Funakoshi T, Tsukuda K. Recommending home hemodialysis—know-how for smooth introduction: from a medical economic perspective. Jpn J Clin Dial. 2019;35:1299–303.
5. Japan Association of Dialysis Physicians, Home Hemodialysis Subcommittee of the Renal Failure Countermeasures Committee. Home hemodialysis management manual (revised edition). Japan Association of Dialysis Physicians. 2020 http://www.touseki-ikai.or.jp/htm/05_publish/doc_m_and_g/20200831_home_hemodialysis.pdf