Author:
Kim Jin Hee,Jung Jae Yun,Lee Sangyun,Hwang Soyun,Park Joong Wan,Lee Eui Jun,Lee Ha Ni,Kim Do Kyun,Kwak Young Ho
Abstract
Abstract
Background
We aimed to identify the ideal chest compression site for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients with a single ventricle with dextrocardia corrected by Fontan surgery.
Methods
The most recent stored chest computed tomography images of all patients with a single ventricle who underwent Fontan surgery were retrospectively analysed. We reported that the ideal chest compression site is the largest part of the compressed single ventricle. To identify the ideal chest compression site, we measured the distance from the midline of the sternum to the point of the maximum sagittal area of the single ventricle as a deviation and calculated the area fraction of the compressed structures.
Results
58 patients (67.2% male) were analysed. The mean right deviation from the midline of the sternum to the ideal compression site was similar to the mean sternum width (32.85 ± 15.61 vs. 31.05 ± 6.75 mm). When chest compression was performed at the ideal site, the area fraction of the single ventricle significantly increased by 7%, which was greater than that of conventional compression (0.15 ± 0.10 vs. 0.22 ± 0.11, P < 0.05).
Conclusions
When performing CPR on a patient with Fontan circulation with dextrocardia, right-sided chest compression may be better than the conventional location.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference13 articles.
1. Hedlund E, Lundell B. Fontan circulation has improved life expectancy for infants born with complex Heart Disease over the last 50 years but has also resulted in significant morbidity. Acta Paediatr. 2022;111(1):11–6.
2. Alsaied T, Bokma JP, Engel ME, Kuijpers JM, Hanke SP, Zuhlke L, et al. Factors associated with long-term mortality after Fontan procedures: a systematic review. Heart. 2017;103(2):104–10.
3. Ha AC, Doumouras BS, Wang CN, Tranmer J, Lee DS. Prediction of sudden Cardiac Arrest in the general population: review of traditional and emerging risk factors. Can J Cardiol. 2022;38(4):465–78.
4. Olasveengen TM, Semeraro F, Ristagno G, Castren M, Handley A, Kuzovlev A, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: basic life support. Resuscitation. 2021;161:98–114.
5. Topjian AA, Raymond TT, Atkins D, Chan M, Duff JP, Joyner BL Jr, et al. Part 4: pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020;142(16Suppl2):469–S523.