Abstract
Abstract
Background
Instability in self-esteem and instability in affect are core features of borderline personality disorder (BPD). For decades, researchers and theorists have been interested in the temporal dynamics between these constructs. Some hypothesize that changes in affective states should precede changes in self-esteem (Linehan, Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders, 1993), while others suggest that changes in self-esteem should precede changes in affective states (Kernberg, Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism, 1975).
Methods
In this study, we investigated the temporal relations between negative affective arousal states and current self-esteem in daily life. Patients with BPD (n = 42) or depressive disorders (DD; n = 40), and non-clinical controls (NCC; n = 40) were assessed every 15 min for 13 h.
Results
As expected, dynamic structural equation modeling showed higher levels of average daily negative affective arousal and lower levels of average daily self-esteem in the BPD group compared with the NCC group, and scores in the DD group were in-between the BPD and the NCC groups. In line with predictions based on Linehan’s (Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders, 1993) model of affective dysregulation in BPD, negative affective arousal (t) and subsequent self-esteem (t+ 1) were significantly linked only in the BPD group, implying that higher negative affective arousal is followed by lower current self-esteem in the next measurement (ca. 15 min later). Importantly, self-esteem (t) and subsequent negative affective arousal (t + 1) were not significantly related (Kernberg, Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism, 1975).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest close dynamic temporal relations between affective instability and self-esteem instability in BPD, which highlights the importance of providing patients with means to effectively modulate high negative affective arousal states.
Funder
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Biological Psychiatry,Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology
Reference86 articles.
1. Abela JRZ, Payne AVL, Moussaly N. Cognitive vulnerability to depression in individuals with borderline personality disorder. J Pers Disord. 2003;17(4):319–29. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.17.4.319.23968.
2. Allen JG, Fonagy P, Bateman AW. Mentalizing in clinical practice. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2008.
3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5-TR (5. ed., text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2022.
4. Asparouhov T, Hamaker EL, Muthén B. Dynamic structural equation models. Struct Equ Modeling. 2018;25(3):359–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1406803.
5. Aspharouhov & Muthén. Bayesian Analysis Using Mplus: Technical Implementation. 2010. Available at https://www.statmodel.com/download/Bayes3.pdf.