The relationship between social support, coping strategies and psychological distress and positive mental well-being in carers of people with borderline personality disorder

Author:

Hayes Aoife,Dempsey Maria,Kells Mary,Murphy Mike

Abstract

Abstract Background Informal carers of people with BPD experience high levels of burden and psychological distress relative to other populations. There is a scarcity of research evidencing the influence of modifiable factors on carer outcomes to inform interventions. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between social support, coping strategies and psychological distress and positive mental well-being in this carer population. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 1207 carers completed the McLean Screening Instrument for BPD-Carer Version, the Brief COPE, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, the Kessler Psychological Distress scale, the WHO-5 Well-being Index, and the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale. Data for 863 participants who met the inclusion criteria were analysed. Results Carers reported low positive mental well-being and high psychological distress. Perceived social support and several coping strategies were significant unique predictors of psychological distress and positive mental well-being. Perceived social support and positive reframing were the strongest predictors of higher positive mental well-being and lower psychological distress. Self-blame, behavioural disengagement and substance use were the strongest predictors of adverse outcomes. Conclusions The findings evidence modifiable factors that may be used to improve informal carer outcomes and indicate that carer interventions may be improved by focusing on reducing the use of self-blame, behavioural disengagement and substance use, and development of quality social support and skills to positively reframe caregiving situations.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Biological Psychiatry,Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Reference85 articles.

1. American Psychiatric Association [APA]. Diagnostic and statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM 5. 5 ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.

2. Kirtley J, Chiocchi J, Cole J, Sampson M. Stigma, emotion appraisal, and the family environment as predictors of carer burden for relatives of individuals who meet the diagnostic criteria for Borderline personality disorder. J Personal Disord. 2019;33(4):497–514.

3. Paris J, Zweig-Frank H. The 27-year follow-up of patients with borderline personality disorder. Compr Psychiatr. 2001;42(6):482–7.

4. National Health and Medical Research Council. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Borderline Personality Disorder. Melbourne, National Health and Medical Research Council. 2012. Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/clinical-practice-guideline-borderline-personality-disorder#block-views-block-file-attachments-content-block-1.

5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Borderline personality disorder: recognition and management (CG78). 2009.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3