Author:
Zou Rifeng,Lin Feng,Hao Chunyu,Zhou Dapeng,Liang Jiulong,Wang Hongyi
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Elliptical excision is the most commonly used method for small benign tumour excision and primary closure. However, elliptical excision remains the topic of debate. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship among postoperative incision, vertex angle, and the length and width of fusiform excision through a mathematical model.
Methods
We collected data from fusiform circle excisions performed at the author’s hospital (101 cases). The measured values were applied to the mathematical model formula for statistical analysis.
Results
The functional relationships among the length, width, arc, and angle of the fusiform circle were obtained. The mean apical tangent angle was 100.731°±15.782°, and the mean apical inner angle was 50.366°±7.891°. There was no significant difference between the preoperatively designed arc length preoperative and the postoperative incision length (P < 0.001). The apical vertex push-out distance equals half of the value of the fusiform length subtracted from arc.
Conclusions
The mathematical model can be used to design the incision for ellipse fusiform excision to predict the final wound length.
Funder
National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Choi JI, Son D. Changes in the length and area of congenital nevi involving the face and extremities after two serial excisions. Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2021;27(2):61–8.
2. Rosendahl C, Hishon M, Akay BN. Shave Versus Elliptical Biopsy for Melanoma substantially increases re-excision area and Length. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44(5):731–3.
3. Nantel-Battista M, Murray C. Dermatologic Surgical pearls: enhancing the efficacy of the traditional elliptical excision. J Cutan Med Surg. 2015;19(3):287–90.
4. Kimyai-Asadi A, Goldberg LH, Nemeth A, Friedman PM, Jih MH. Mohs micrographic Surgery for elliptical excision of skin tumors: a surgical and histologic study. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(10):1310–7. discussion 7–8.
5. Kean J, Hough M, Stevenson JH. Skin excision and groin lymphadenectomy: techniques and outcomes. Lymphology. 2006;39(3):141–6.