Author:
Jin Yazhou,Guo Xinbin,Quan Tao,Zhao Rui,Li Tianxiao,Zhao Zhenwei,Yang Hua,Zhu Xingen,Liang Guobiao,Leng Bing,Wu Xin,Wang Yang,Guan Sheng
Abstract
Abstract
Background and purpose
The CATCH (Coil Application Trial in China) trial was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Numen Coil Embolization System in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in comparison with the Axium coil (ev3/Medtronic). Although the endovascular treatment of small (< 5 mm) intracranial aneurysms has been reported with favorable long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes, randomized trials are still lacking. Data for aneurysms smaller than 5 mm were extracted from the CATCH trial.
Materials and methods
A randomized, prospective, multicenter trial was conducted at ten centers throughout China. Enrolled subjects with small intracranial aneurysms were randomly assigned to receive treatment with the Numen Coil or the Axium coil. The primary outcome was successful aneurysm occlusion at the 6-month follow-up. In contrast, the secondary outcomes included complete aneurysm occlusion, recurrence rate, clinical deterioration, and safety data at the 6-month and 12-month follow-ups.
Results
A total of 124 patients were enrolled in the study. Overall, 58 patients were assigned to the Numen group, and 66 were assigned to the Axium group. At the 6-month follow-up, the successful aneurysm occlusion rate was 93.1% (54/58) in the MicroPort NeuroTech group and 97.0% (64/66) in the Axium group, with a common odds ratio of 0.208 (95% confidence interval, 0.023–1.914; P = 0.184). Complications were comparable between the groups.
Conclusions
Compared with the Aixum coil, the Numen coil is safe and effective in treating small intracranial aneurysms.
Trial registration
(13/12/2016, NCT02990156)
Funder
National Key R&D Program of China during the 13th Five-year Plan Period
National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Project, and the Project of the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC