Magnitude of early relaparotomy and its outcome among patients who underwent laparotomy in a tertiary hospital in Eastern Ethiopia: a cross- sectional study

Author:

Amentie Eyobel,Beyene Badhaasaa,Sisay Mekonnen,Zelka Muluwas Amentie,Nigussie ShambelORCID

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Several studies conducted worldwide revealed the magnitude of early relaparotomy and its outcome among patients undergoing laparotomy. However, there was very little evidence on the magnitude of early relaparotomy and its outcome among patients who underwent laparotomy in Ethiopia, especially in the study area. Objective this study aimed to the assess magnitude of early relaparotomy and its outcome among patients who underwent laparotomy in a Tertiary Hospital in Eastern Ethiopia. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. All patients who underwent laparotomy during the data retrieval period were included. Data were collected using a data abstraction checklist from patients’ medical records. The collected data were entered, cleaned, and analyzed by using SPSS version 23. Descriptives statistics were generated where by continuous variables were summarized into means and standard deviation and categorical variables were summarized as the frequency with proportions. Result The magnitude of relaparotomy was 6.8%. Among 82 patients included in the final analysis, 53 (64.6%) were males and the mean (± SD) age of patients was 33.32 ± 16.63 years. The major indications for relaparotomy were intra-abdominal collection (26.8%) and anastomotic leak (24.4%). Among 82 patients who underwent relaparotomy, 52(63.4%) were developed post relaparotomy complications, and 30(36.6%) patients died. Conclusion The magnitude of early relaparotomy was 6.8%. The magnitude of in-hospital mortality was high in comparison to earlier study findings from developing countries. About three fourth of patients who underwent relaparotomy were developed postoperative complications.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference17 articles.

1. Girgor’ev SG, Petrov VA, Grigor’eva TS. [Relaparotomy Probl Terminology] Khirurgiia. 2003(6):60–2; discussion 2–3.

2. León-Asdrúbal SB, Juárez-de la Torre JC, Navarro-Tovar F, Heredia-Montaño M, Quintero-Cabrera JE. [Abdominal unplanned reoperations in the service of general surgery, University Hospital of Puebla]. Gac Med Mex. 2016;152(4):508–15.

3. Negussie T, Gosaye A, Dejene B. Outcomes of early relaparotomy in pediatric patients at Tikur Anbessa teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a five-year retrospective review. BMC Surg. 2018;18(1):99.

4. Youtchev Y, St Nicolou SN, Ovcharov I, Petrov A. Relaparotomy definition and attempt for a new clinical classification. Trakic J Sci. 2010;8(1):87–90.

5. BAŞOL Ö, Pülat H, Zihni I, Damar S, Özçelik KÇ, Eken H, et al. Predictive factors affecting mortality in relaparotomies. Int J Clin Exp Med [Internet]. 2016;9(7):14656–62.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3