Author:
Wu Jingjin,Zhang Li,Jia Xiaojian,Mu Yunchuan,Lou Yanbo
Abstract
Abstract
Background
While vascular puncture is always performed before making port pocket in the implantation of totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAP), some surgeons preferred to make port pocket first. This study seeks to verify the safety and feasibility for the pocket-first technique.
Methods
The study retrospectively reviewed 447 patients who undergone TIVAP implantation from July 2017 to November 2022. All the patients were divided into two groups based on vascular puncture first or making port pocket first. The general information, operation information and post-operative complications were reviewed and analyzed.
Results
All the operations were performed successfully. No difference was observed in the sex, age, height, weight, BMI, port location and total complication rate between the two groups. The operation time of the Puncture Group and the Pocket Group were 46.9 ± 22.4 min and 33.8 ± 13.6 min ( P<0.00001 ). In the patients of SCV approach, the operation time between the two groups were 37.4 ± 14.8 min and 33.5 ± 10.9 min ( P<0.05 ). Multivariate analysis showed the variable BMI and first procedure were independent prognostic factors for operation time. In the cases using SCV/AxV approach the variable first procedure was the only independent prognostic factor for operation time (P = 0.002).
Conclusions
The pocket-first technique can be considered as a safe, feasible and convenient technique for TIVAP implantation. The time consuming is significantly shortened compared with the puncture-first technique and this advantage may be more obvious when using SCV/AxV approach.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Niederhuber Je Fau -, Ensminger W, Ensminger W, Fau - Gyves JW, Gyves Jw Fau -, Liepman M, Liepman M, Fau - Doan K, Doan K, Fau - Cozzi E, Cozzi E. Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery. 1982;92(4):706–12.
2. Yeow M, Soh S, Yap R, Tay D, Low YF, Goh SSN, Yeo CS, Lo ZJ. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on choice of central venous access device for delivery of chemotherapy. Journal of vascular surgery Venous and lymphatic disorders 2022.
3. Zhang KC, Chen L, Chinese Research Hospital Association Digestive, Tumor C, Chinese Association of Upper, Gastrointestinal S, Chinese Gastric Cancer A. Gastrointestinal Surgical Group of Chinese Surgical Society Affiliated to the Chinese Medical A: Chinese expert consensus and practice guideline of totally implantable access port for digestive tract carcinomas. World journal of gastroenterology 2020, 26(25):3517–3527.
4. Wang P, Soh KL, Ying Y, Liu Y, Huang X, Huang J. Risk of VTE associated with PORTs and PICCs in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2022;213(Electronic):1879–2472.
5. Huttner FJ, Bruckner T, Hackbusch M, Weitz J, Bork U, Kotschenreuther P, Heupel O, Kummel S, Schlitt HJ, Mattulat M, et al. Primary Open Versus closed Implantation Strategy for totally implantable venous Access ports: the Multicentre Randomized Controlled PORTAS-3 Trial (DRKS 00004900). Ann Surg. 2020;272(6):950–60.