Author:
Chen Jingjing,Mo Yan,Chen Yadan,Ma Zhouji,Shen Siyun,Sang Hong,Tan Qian,Mo Ran
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the application and effectiveness of tension-reducing suture in the repair of hypertrophic scars.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of clinical data was conducted on 82 patients with hypertrophic scars treated at the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from September 2021 to December 2022. Patients were operated with combination of heart-shaped tension-reducing suturing technique and looped, broad, and deep buried (LBD) suturing technique or conventional suture method. Outcomes of surgical treatment were assessed before and 6 months after surgery using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS).
Results
Improvements were achieved on scar quality compared to that preoperatively, with a reduction in scar width (1.7 ± 0.6 cm vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 cm, P < 0.001). Assessment using the POSAS and VSS scales showed significant improvements in each single parameter and total score compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05). The Combination method group achieved better score in total score of VSS scale, in color, stiffness, thickness and overall opinion of PSAS scale, and in vascularity, thickness, pliability and overall opinion of OSAS scale.
Conclusion
The amalgamation of the heart-shaped tension-reducing suturing technique and the LBD suturing technique has shown promising outcomes, garnering notably high levels of patient satisfaction in the context of hypertrophic scar repair. Patients have exhibited favorable postoperative recoveries, underscoring the clinical merit and the prospective broader applicability of this approach in the realm of hypertrophic scar management.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Frech FS, Hernandez L, Urbonas R, Zaken GA, Dreyfuss I, Nouri K. Hypertrophic scars and keloids: advances in treatment and review of established therapies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023;24(2):225–45.
2. Poetschke J, Gauglitz GG. Current options for the treatment of pathological scarring. J Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = J German Soc Dermatology: JDDG. 2016;14(5):467–77.
3. Ogawa R, Akita S, Akaishi S, Aramaki-Hattori N, Dohi T, Hayashi T, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars-Japan Scar Workshop Consensus Document 2018. Burns Trauma. 2019;7:39.
4. Ogawa R. The most current algorithms for the Treatment and Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars and keloids: a 2020 update of the algorithms published 10 years ago. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;149(1):e79–94.
5. Wall HC, Halani SH, Mosieri C, Daniel C, Gallo L, Eaves FF, et al. Tension reduction with Force modulating tissue bridges reduces wounds in breast surgery. Aesthetic Surg J. 2023;43(12):1471–80.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献