Author:
Hogg James,Cameron Jessica,Cramb Susanna,Baade Peter,Mengersen Kerrie
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cancer is a significant health issue globally and it is well known that cancer risk varies geographically. However in many countries there are no small area-level data on cancer risk factors with high resolution and complete reach, which hinders the development of targeted prevention strategies.
Methods
Using Australia as a case study, the 2017–2018 National Health Survey was used to generate prevalence estimates for 2221 small areas across Australia for eight cancer risk factor measures covering smoking, alcohol, physical activity, diet and weight. Utilising a recently developed Bayesian two-stage small area estimation methodology, the model incorporated survey-only covariates, spatial smoothing and hierarchical modelling techniques, along with a vast array of small area-level auxiliary data, including census, remoteness, and socioeconomic data. The models borrowed strength from previously published cancer risk estimates provided by the Social Health Atlases of Australia. Estimates were internally and externally validated.
Results
We illustrated that in 2017–2018 health behaviours across Australia exhibited more spatial disparities than previously realised by improving the reach and resolution of formerly published cancer risk factors. The derived estimates revealed higher prevalence of unhealthy behaviours in more remote areas, and areas of lower socioeconomic status; a trend that aligned well with previous work.
Conclusions
Our study addresses the gaps in small area level cancer risk factor estimates in Australia. The new estimates provide improved spatial resolution and reach and will enable more targeted cancer prevention strategies at the small area level. Furthermore, by including the results in the next release of the Australian Cancer Atlas, which currently provides small area level estimates of cancer incidence and relative survival, this work will help to provide a more comprehensive picture of cancer in Australia by supporting policy makers, researchers, and the general public in understanding the spatial distribution of cancer risk factors. The methodology applied in this work is generalisable to other small area estimation applications and has been shown to perform well when the survey data are sparse.
Funder
Queensland University of Technology (QUT) Centre for Data Science and Cancer Council QLD (CCQ) Scholarship
National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Business, Management and Accounting,General Computer Science
Reference89 articles.
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.
2. Cancer Council Queensland, Queensland University of Technology, FrontierSI: Australian Cancer Atlas (2023). https://gis.cancer.gov/canceratlas/app/
3. Whiteman DC, Webb PM, Green AC, Neale RE, Fritschi L, Bain CJ, Parkin DM, Wilson LF, Olsen CM, Nagle CM, Pandeya N, Jordan SJ, Antonsson A, Kendall BJ, Hughes MCB, Ibiebele TI, Miura K, Peters S, Carey RN. Cancers in australia in 2010 attributable to modifiable factors: introduction and overview. Australian New Zealand J Public Health. 2015;39(5):403–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12471.
4. Public Health Information Development Unit: Social Health Atlases of Australia (2018). https://phidu.torrens.edu.au/social-health-atlases
5. Centre for Disease Control: PLACES: Local Data for Better Health (2021). https://www.cdc.gov/places