Author:
He Weijing,Yang Yufei,Liu Qi,Luo Dakui,Li Qingguo,Li Xinxiang
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To evaluate the clinical value of serum CEA levels and their implications on the diagnostic value of the conventional TNM staging system in the oldest-old patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
Methods
The recruited subjects were colorectal cancer patients aged 85 and older. The cutoff value for normal CEA level is 5 ng/mL. Patients with elevated CEA levels were categorized as stage C1, and those with normal CEA levels as stage C0. A number of Cox proportional hazard regression models were established to evaluate the prognosis of different prognostic factors with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Kaplan–Meier method was utilized to display the disparate prognostic impact of multiple clinicopathological factors with the log-rank test.
Results
A total of 17,359 oldest-old patients diagnosed with CRC were recruited from the SEER database. The conditional survival of oldest-old patients with CRC was dismal with a 1-year conditional survival of only 11%, 18%, and 30% for patients surviving 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Patients with stage C1 exhibited a 48.5% increased risk of CRC-specific mortality compared with stage C0 (HR = 1.485, 95%CI = 1.393–1.583, using stage C0 patients as the reference, P < 0.001). All the stage C0 patients indicated lower HRs relative to the corresponding stage C1 patients.
Conclusions
Dismal conditional survival of oldest-old patients with CRC should be given additional consideration. C stage influences the prognosis of oldest-old patients with CRC.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.
2. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, et al. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66:683–91.
3. Pang L, de la Cruz M, Wu J, et al. Symptom frequency and change of 36 old cancer patients. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2019;27:4165–70.
4. United States, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute (nci), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program . SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Colon and Rectum Cancer [Web page] Bethesda, MD: NCI; n.d. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html; Cited 6 December 2020.
5. Simmonds PD, Best L, George S, et al. Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2000;356:968–74.