Amyloid A and lactic acid as a predictor in patients with sepsis in patients with liver cirrhosis

Abstract

Abstract Background Sepsis is triggered by pathogenic microorganisms, resulting in a systemic inflammatory response. Liver cirrhosis and sepsis create a vicious cycle: cirrhosis weakens immune function, raising infection risk and hindering pathogen clearance. Optimal treatment outcomes depend on understanding liver cirrhosis patients’ sepsis risk factors. Thus, preventing sepsis involves addressing these risk factors. Therefore, early identification and understanding of clinical characteristics in liver cirrhosis patients with sepsis are crucial for selecting appropriate antibiotics. A case-control study using logistic regression was conducted to examine the prognostic value of amyloid A/lactate level monitoring in identifying sepsis risk factors in liver cirrhosis patients. Methods From March 2020 to March 2022, 136 liver cirrhosis patients treated at our hospital were divided into a sepsis group (n = 35) and a non-sepsis group (n = 101) based on sepsis complications. General clinical data were collected. Univariate analysis screened for liver cirrhosis patients’ sepsis risk factors. Multivariate logistic analysis was subsequently employed to evaluate the risk factors. Sepsis patients were followed up for a month. Based on prognosis, patients were categorized into a poor prognosis group (n = 16) and a good prognosis group (n = 19). Serum amyloid A (SAA) and blood lactic acid (BLA) levels were compared between the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the prognostic value of both individual and combined SAA/BLA monitoring. Results Patient data, including age, diabetes history, liver cancer, hepatic artery embolization, recent antibiotic use, invasive procedures within two weeks, APACHE II Scoring, ALB and SAA and BLA levels, were compared between the sepsis and non-sepsis groups, showing significant differences (P < 0.05). Logistic regression identified factors such as age ≥ 70, recent antibiotic use, recent invasive procedures, history of liver cancer, hepatic artery embolization history, high APACHE II scores, decreased albumin, and elevated SAA and BLA levels as independent sepsis risk factors in liver cirrhosis patients (P < 0.05). Among the 35 sepsis patients, 16 had a poor prognosis, representing an incidence rate of 45.71%. Serum SAA and BLA levels were significantly higher in the poor prognosis group than in the good prognosis group (P < 0.05). The AUC for serum SAA and BLA was 0.831 (95%CI: 0.738–0.924), 0.720 (95%CI: 0.600–0.840), and 0.909 (95%CI: 0.847–0.972), respectively. The combined diagnostic AUC was significantly higher than that of single factor predictions (P < 0.05). The predictive value ranked as follows: joint detection > SAA > BLA. Conclusion In treating liver cirrhosis, prioritize patients with advanced age, a history of hepatic artery embolization, recent invasive operations, history of liver cancer, recent antibiotic exposure, high APACHE II scores and low albumin. Closely monitoring serum SAA and BLA levels in these patients can offer valuable insights for early clinical prevention and treatment.