Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of elobixibat plus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate and split-dose 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for bowel preparation before outpatient colonoscopy: a study protocol for the multicentre, randomised, controlled E-PLUS trial
-
Published:2024-02-03
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-230X
-
Container-title:BMC Gastroenterology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Gastroenterol
Author:
Hotta KinichiORCID, Otake Yosuke, Yamaguchi Daisuke, Shimodate Yuichi, Hanabata Norihiro, Ikematsu Hiroaki, Yabuuchi Yohei, Sano Yasushi, Shimoda Ryo, Sugimoto Shinya, Oba Mari, Takamaru Hiroyuki, Kimura Kouichiro, Kishida Yoshihiro, Takada Kazunori, Ito Sayo, Imai Kenichiro, Hosotani Kazuya, Murano Tatsuro, Yamada Masayoshi, Shinmura Kensuke, Takezawa Rio, Tomonaga Michito, Saito Yutaka
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Sodium picosulfate (SP)/magnesium citrate (MC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus ascorbic acid are recommended by Western guidelines as laxative solutions for bowel preparation. Clinically, SP/MC has a slower post-dose defaecation response than PEG and is perceived as less cleansing; therefore, it is not currently used for major bowel cancer screening preparation. The standard formulation for bowel preparation is PEG; however, a large dose is required, and it has a distinctive flavour that is considered unpleasant. SP/MC requires a small dose and ensures fluid intake because it is administered in another beverage. Therefore, clinical trials have shown that SP/MC is superior to PEG in terms of acceptability. We aim to compare the novel bowel cleansing method (test group) comprising SP/MC with elobixibat hydrate and the standard bowel cleansing method comprising PEG plus ascorbic acid (standard group) for patients preparing for outpatient colonoscopy.
Methods
This phase III, multicentre, single-blind, noninferiority, randomised, controlled, trial has not yet been completed. Patients aged 40–69 years will be included as participants. Patients with a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, constipation, inflammatory bowel disease, or severe organ dysfunction will be excluded. The target number of research participants is 540 (standard group, 270 cases; test group, 270 cases). The primary endpoint is the degree of bowel cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale [BBPS] score ≥ 6). The secondary endpoints are patient acceptability, adverse events, polyp/adenoma detection rate, number of polyps/adenomas detected, degree of bowel cleansing according to the BBPS (BBPS score ≥ 8), degree of bowel cleansing according to the Aronchik scale, and bowel cleansing time.
Discussion
This trial aims to develop a “patient-first” colon cleansing regimen without the risk of inadequate bowel preparation by using both elobixibat hydrate and SP/MC.
Trial registration
Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; no. s041210067; 9 September 2021; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/), protocol version 1.5 (May 1, 2023).
Funder
Nippon Chemiphar Co.Ltd.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference11 articles.
1. Saito Y, Oka S, Kawamura T, Shimoda R, Sekiguchi M, Tamai N, Hotta K, Matsuda T, Misawa M, Tanaka S, et al. Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Endosc. 2021;33(4):486–519. 2. Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F, Spada C, Benamouzig R, Bisschops R, Bretthauer M, Dekker E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ferlitsch M, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019;51(8):775–94. 3. Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Martel M, Robertson DJ, Boland CR, Giardello FM, Lieberman DA, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(4):903–24. 4. Phase III trial of Picoprep
https://www.nc-medical.com/picoprep/products/efficacy.html. 5. Jin Z, Lu Y, Zhou Y, Gong B. Systematic review and meta-analysis: sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate vs. polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;72(5):523–32.
|
|