Author:
Otero-Piñerio Ana M.,Aykun N.,Maspero M.,Holubar Stefan,Hull Tracy,Lipman Jeremy,Steele Scott R.,Lightner Amy L.
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Perianal disease occurs in up to 34% of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. An estimated 25% of women will become pregnant after the initial diagnosis, thus introducing the dilemma of whether mode of delivery affects perianal disease. The aim of our study was to analyze whether a cesarean section (C-section) or vaginal delivery influence perianal involvement. We hypothesized the delivery route would not alter post-partum perianal manifestations in the setting of previously healed perianal disease.
Methods
All consecutive eligible IBD female patients between 1997 and 2022 who delivered were included. Prior perianal involvement, perianal flare after delivery and delivery method were noted.
Results
We identified 190 patients with IBD who had a total of 322 deliveries; 169 (52%) were vaginal and 153 (48%) were by C-section. Nineteen women (10%) experienced 21/322 (6%) post-partum perianal flares. Independent predictors were previous abdominal surgery for IBD (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1–7.2; p = 0.042), ileocolonic involvement (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.1–9.4; p = 0.030), previous perianal disease (OR, 22; 95% CI, 7–69; p < 0.001), active perianal disease (OR, 96; 95% CI, 21–446; p < 0.001) and biologic (OR, 4.4; 95% CI,1.4–13.6; p < 0.011) or antibiotic (OR, 19.6; 95% CI, 7–54; p < 0.001) treatment. Negative association was found for vaginal delivery (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06–0.61; p < 0.005). Number of post-partum flares was higher in the C-section group [17 (11%) vs. 4 (2%), p = 0.002].
Conclusions
Delivery by C-section section was not protective of ongoing perianal disease activity post-delivery, but should be recommended for women with active perianal involvement.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Brandt LJ, Estabrook SGRJ. Results of a survey to evaluate whether vaginal delivery and episiotomy lead to perineal involvement in women with Crohn’s Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:1918–22.
2. Ilnyckyj A, Blanchard JF, Rawsthorne P, Bernstein CN. Perianal Crohn’s Disease and pregnancy: role of the mode of delivery. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(11):3274–8.
3. Rogers RG, Katz VL. Course of Crohn’s Disease during pregnancy and its effect on pregnancy outcome: a retrospective review. Am J Perinatol. 1995;12(4):262–4.
4. Brochard C, Rabilloud ML, Hamonic S, Bajeux E, Pagenault M, Dabadie A, et al. Natural history of Perianal Crohn’s Disease: long-term follow-up of a Population-based cohort. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(2):e102–10.
5. Schaden D, Schauer G, Haas F, Berger A. Myocutaneous flaps and proctocolectomy in severe perianal Crohn’s disease–a single stage procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(12):1453–7.