Author:
Tani Yasuhiro,Ishihara Ryu,Inoue Takahiro,Okubo Yuki,Kawakami Yushi,Matsueda Katsunori,Miyake Muneaki,Yoshii Shunsuke,Shichijo Satoki,Kanesaka Takashi,Yamamoto Sachiko,Takeuchi Yoji,Higashino Koji,Uedo Noriya,Michida Tomoki,Kato Yusuke,Tada Tomohiro
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Several pre-clinical studies have reported the usefulness of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in the diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We conducted this study to evaluate the usefulness of an AI system for real-time diagnosis of ESCC in a clinical setting.
Methods
This study followed a single-center prospective single-arm non-inferiority design. Patients at high risk for ESCC were recruited and real-time diagnosis by the AI system was compared with that of endoscopists for lesions suspected to be ESCC. The primary outcomes were the diagnostic accuracy of the AI system and endoscopists. The secondary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and adverse events.
Results
A total of 237 lesions were evaluated. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the AI system were 80.6%, 68.2%, and 83.4%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of endoscopists were 85.7%, 61.4%, and 91.2%, respectively. The difference between the accuracy of the AI system and that of the endoscopists was − 5.1%, and the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval was less than the non-inferiority margin.
Conclusions
The non-inferiority of the AI system in comparison with endoscopists in the real-time diagnosis of ESCC in a clinical setting was not proven.
Trial registration
Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs052200015, 18/05/2020).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Gastroenterology,General Medicine
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献